Liberal-oriented columns, commentary and archived articles on national and international news, politics, and the communication arts--with emphasis on China--by Joseph Bosco, author, journalist, director and actor; Professor of Drama and Communications at Beijing Foreign Studies University. 

Monday, January 19, 2004

Taking The Show On The Road

A novel proposal: The LongBow Papers is going on the road. We are flying to the states in a couple of hours for our first visit home after a year-and-a-half in China. While I will have my computer with me, between the hustle and bustle of visiting relatives and friends in 3 states in 17 days and the always problematical issue of readily available Internet connections while traveling, I do not know how much blogging I will be able to do. I will do what I can. I hope you will have patience with me. I treasure each and every one of my regular readers. I do not want to lose any of you.

In the spirit of thank you, and as an artistic experiment, I am going to do something I have never done before. I am going to offer for public viewing an unpublished literary property. Below is a link to the first three chapters of one of my next two books, a novel that has been years in the making but is now just about ready to go to the publisher. Ah, but I said two books: The chapters I will link to in this post, is Book One of a Two Book saga; a prequel to a sequel, or a sequel to a prequel, depending on the viewpoint. The chapters I offer for your pleasure or your critique here are from:

THE SCOTCH AND MARIJUANA PAPERS

The Confessions of an Artist

Book One

CRAZY SORROWS


I truly do want your comments, good bad or indifferent; if you have any thoughts about the work, please e-mail them to me: E-mail link

Thank you.
 


1:25 PM / Editor / permalink    0 comments  



Sunday, January 18, 2004

The Peking Duck & Thomas L. Friedman

Richard, the author and proprietor of The Peking Duck, has a post and link to a very important column by Thomas L. Friedman. Indeed, quick-witted and quick-fingered Richard--with one arm immobilized due to surgery no-less--beat me to the click on this one. However, I will happily refer you to his shop:
The Peking Duck: Thomas Friedman at his most explosive

And, as is often the case, he is absolutely right
The Peking Duck
 


11:22 PM / Editor / permalink    0 comments  




Dowd on Dean

America has enough false prophets and ready-made myths, both are terms I believe are accurate labels for the pedestrian American short story that is Howard Dean, the doctor and fake from Vermont who would be president. This is not news to regular readers of these pages. However, I have been waiting for someone else in the media, a colleague with a much larger audience and certainly more wit than I to spell out what it is that is "smelly" about the man. My wait is over. The inimitable Maureen Dowd has worked her magic with words yet again:
DES MOINES--I went to Iowa hunting Howard Dean. His campaign said he might give me five minutes. On the phone.

At first, five minutes sounded pretty cursory. But I decided to be philosophical. Out of his 15 minutes of angry fame, Howard Dean was willing to devote a third of it to me.

How best to figure out someone who comes out of nowhere and wants to lead the world in five minutes?

I quizzed Tom Harkin, Mr. Iowa, about why he had endorsed Dr. Dean, even though it infuriated his spurned Senate buddy John Kerry and disappointed fellow Midwesterner Dick Gephardt. Senator Harkin didn't seem especially close to the Vermont governor. At the 2002 Jefferson-Jackson Day dinner here, he twice called the Democrat John Dean (as Martin Sheen did in a speech here last week).

"He's a fire hydrant," Mr. Harkin said over dinner at Bambino's in Cumming. "If you kick it, it's going to hurt you. But it's stable and secure and there when you need it."

It wasn't the most glamorous metaphor. But I knew what he meant.

Democrats yearn for somebody tough enough to stand up to the Bush family machine. They're still smarting that Al Gore lost a presidency he won. They watched even a fellow as gritty as John McCain crumple during the 2000 South Carolina primary, stunned by the sulfurous personal attacks of Bush supporters.

A fire hydrant sprays back.

Dr. Dean has certainly proved he's tough. The press critiques on him ? "hotheaded," "arrogant," "mercurial," "a jerk" ? echo the knocks on W., back before "the Roman candle" of the Bush family ran for Texas governor and transformed himself into a disciplined and genial campaigner.

After months of watching Dr. Dean's neck bulging, face churning, and sleeves rolled up tourniquet-tight, many of my colleagues were longing to ask the pugilistic pol, as one put it: "Do you ever lighten up, dude?"

I decided to use my five minutes to find out if he has the sunny side Americans love in their leaders. I'd ask him what he'd want to do for fun on a Saturday night if he could play hooky. I'd ask him the last time he did something goofy and what made him really laugh.

While I was waiting for him to call, I grew more and more afraid that he'd get angry at me for wasting his time with piffle. I cowered by the phone, jumping when it rang.

I never got the five minutes with him. Which left me five minutes to think about why his candidacy was sputtering.

He has a problem with his mythic arc. Presidential campaigns trace the patterns of mythological adventure, as contenders strive to show they are superior in the knightly virtues of temperance, loyalty and courage.

Once candidates showed that they had completed the "hero-task" by highlighting their war exploits ? J.F.K. and PT 109, George Bush senior getting shot down as a young Navy pilot over Chichi Jima.

Candidates in the Vietnam War generation who chose not to go to Vietnam had to find more personal dragons and giants to slay. Bill Clinton told the story of confronting an abusive and alcoholic stepfather; George W. Bush recounted overcoming alcoholism and career drift by embracing Christ.

In Iowa, Mr. Gephardt talks about the transforming experience of his son's battle against cancer. Mr. Kerry describes the crucible of Vietnam. John Edwards's arc is going from the son of a millworker to a Grishamesque trial lawyer standing up against corporate malefactors.

Shunning personal storytelling, Dr. Dean has chosen to make his campaign arc about his campaign arc. He brags of facing down the dragon George W. Bush.

As he said at a rally here last week about his Democratic rivals: "They weren't there when it was time to stand up to the president on the war in Iraq. . . . If you want someone to stand up to George Bush, I've done it."

Personal history shouldn't be a substitute for policy. An overreliance on stories of dramatic heroism and physical suffering can overwhelm a campaign, as it did with Bob Kerrey and Bob Dole, devolving into the politics of self. And yuppie sagas of sin and redemption can become strained with repetition.

But a race rooted mainly in attacking the president may not take Dr. Dean far enough. Voters want someone who's been through the fire. They care about character. They want to know the evolution of the man, even if it's a myth.

The New York Times
 


11:04 PM / Editor / permalink    0 comments  




Hell Continues

The dying continues, so must our resolve...
BAGHDAD, Iraq (CNN) -- At least 23 people were killed -- most of them Iraqi civilians -- and more than 60 were wounded early Sunday when a suicide truck bomber detonated a half-ton of explosives near the U.S.-led coalition's headquarters, according to U.S. military sources. ...

"We have indications that some of those that were killed were American citizens -- U.S. contractors," said Brig. Gen. Mark Kimmitt during a Baghdad news conference. "We believe the current number at two. We're waiting for firmer confirmation."

Earlier, U.S. military sources said that two Department of Defense workers were among the dead, but could not specify their occupations or nationalities. ...

Shortly before 8 a.m. (12 a.m. ET) Sunday, a white Toyota pickup truck carrying almost 1,000 pounds (500 kilograms) of military-grade, plastic explosives tried to enter "Assassin's Gate" -- the northern entrance to the heavily fortified Green Zone, which houses coalition headquarters, Brig. Gen. Mark Hertling of the 1st Armored Division said.

Instead, the driver -- who was also killed in the blast -- detonated the explosives about 50 feet (16 meters) from the entrance, according to military officials.

About 90 percent of the explosion was absorbed by blast barriers, protecting the headquarters from damage, according to Capt. Jason Beck of the 1st Armored Division.

At the U.S. military's 28th combat support hospital in the Green Zone, 20 people were dead and 29 wounded, including three U.S. soldiers and three U.S. civilians, Beck said.
CNN
 


10:24 PM / Editor / permalink    0 comments  




The Vagaries of Predicting Bubble Boom and Bubble Bust

The Peking Duck beat me to the click on an extremely interesting analysis of China's Boom or Burst economy in The New York Times. So, I will direct you to Richard's distinguished site:
The Peking Duck: Is China the Next Bubble? That's the headline of a long and probing New York Times article that looks at China's economy from various angles, weighing the arguments of whether it's a bubble ready to pop or an essentially unstoppable engine that will experience slowdowns and bumps, but not collapse.
The Peking Duck
 


11:47 AM / Editor / permalink    0 comments  




Kristof, Buying Freedom, One Girl at a Time

There is no comment appropriate for this Kristof column. I just read it, cry a little and blog it in hopes that you will read it and maybe together we can at least get people talking about solving this evil anachronism: Slavery in the 21st Century.
POIPET, Cambodia

One thinks of slavery as an evil confined to musty sepia photographs. But there are 21st-century versions of slaves as well, girls like Srey Neth.

I met Srey Neth, a lovely, giggly wisp of a teenager, here in the wild smuggling town of Poipet in northwestern Cambodia. Girls here are bought and sold, but there is an important difference compared with the 19th century: many of these modern slaves will be dead of AIDS by their 20's.

Some 700,000 people are trafficked around the world each year, many of them just girls. They form part of what I believe will be the paramount moral challenge we will face in this century: to address the brutality that is the lot of so many women in the developing world. Yet it's an issue that gets little attention and that most American women's groups have done shamefully little to address.

Poipet, 220 miles on bouncy roads from Phnom Penh, is a dusty collection of dirt alleys lined with brothels, where teenage girls clutch at any man walking by. It has a reputation as one of the wildest places in Cambodia, an anything-goes town ruled by drugs, gangs, gambling and prostitution.

The only way to have access to the girls is to appear to be a customer. So I put out the word that I wanted to meet young girls and stayed at the seedy $8-a-night Phnom Pich Guest House — and a woman who is a pimp soon brought Srey Neth to my room.

Srey Neth claimed to be 18 but looked several years younger. She insisted at first (through my Khmer interpreter) that she was free and not controlled by the guesthouse. But soon she told her real story: a female cousin had arranged her sale and taken her to the guesthouse. Now she was sharing a room with three other prostitutes, and they were all pimped to guests.

"I can walk around in Poipet, but only with a close relative of the owner," she said. "They keep me under close watch.They do not let me go out alone. They're afraid I would run away."

Why not try to escape at night?

"They would get me back, and something bad would happen. Maybe a beating. I heard that when a group of girls tried to escape, they locked them in the rooms and beat them up."

"What about the police?" I asked. "Couldn't you call out to the police for help?"

"The police wouldn't help me because they get bribes from the brothel owners," Srey Neth said, adding that senior police officials had come to the guesthouse for sex with her.

I asked Srey Neth how much it would cost to buy her freedom. She named an amount equivalent to $150.

"Do you really want to leave?" I asked. "Are you sure you wouldn't come back to this?"

She had been watching TV and listlessly answering my questions. Now she turned abruptly and snorted. "This is a hell," she said sharply, speaking with passion for the first time. "You think I want to do this?"

Another girl, Srey Mom, grabbed at me as I walked down the street. She wouldn't let go, tugging me toward the inner depths of her brothel — but she looked so young and pitiable that I couldn't help thinking that she really wanted me to tug her away.

So I did. I paid the owner $8 to spring her for the evening and then took her away for an interview.

The owner let Srey Mom go out unsupervised, it turned out, partly because she had been a prostitute for several years and was trusted to return — and partly because her dark complexion meant that she was of little value anyway. The brothel sold her to men for just $2.50, compared with the $10 commanded by the lighter-skinned Srey Neth.

I asked Srey Mom what her freedom would cost. Payment of about $70 in debts to her brothel owner, she said. Two girls in her brothel had been freed after they found boyfriends who paid their debts, she said, and she spoke of her longing to see her sisters and the rest of her family in her village on the other side of Cambodia.

"Do you really want to leave the brothel?" I asked.

"I love myself," she answered simply. "I do not want to let my life be destroyed by what I'm doing now."

That's when I made a firm decision I'd been toying with for some time: I would try to buy freedom for these two girls and return them to their families. I'll tell you in my column on Wednesday what happens next.
The New York Times
 


3:37 AM / Editor / permalink    0 comments  




We Grieve, But We Cannot Quit

500 heroes, just doing their jobs...
Roadside Bomb Kills 3 American and 2 Iraqi Soldiers

TAJI, Iraq, Jan. 17 — Three American soldiers and two Iraqi paramilitary fighters were killed early Saturday when the armored vehicle they were riding in was struck by a large roadside bomb in this town about 12 miles north of Baghdad, the United States military said.

The American soldiers were with the Fourth Infantry Division, which has oversight for much of the volatile region north of Baghdad, which had been the base of support for the regime of Saddam Hussein. The two Iraqis were with the Iraqi Civil Defense Corps, a paramilitary organization formed by the occupying authorities to help the Americans improve security in Iraq. Two other American soldiers were wounded in the attack.

The deaths of the soldiers on Saturday and another death on Friday in Mosul of a soldier by what the military classified as a "nonhostile" gunshot brought the number of American soldiers killed in operations related to Iraq to 500. Most died after May 1, when the end of major combat operations was declared.

The Americans and Iraqis who were attacked Saturday were patrolling in one of three Bradley armored vehicles surveying Taji for roadside bombs. About 7:45 a.m., the first vehicle in the patrol was struck by a bomb made of at least two 155-millimeter artillery shells and an "unknown amount of explosives," said Maj. Josslyn Aberle, a spokeswoman for the Fourth Infantry Division. The blast set the Bradley on fire.
The New York Times...
 


3:18 AM / Editor / permalink    0 comments  




The Jacksonian Tradition

If you have a serious interest in American Foreign Policy, particularly its military component, you need to read the article which I begin and link to below, from the distinguished foreign policy journal of the "Realist" school, In The National Interest
The Jacksonian Tradition

by Walter Russell Mead

In the last five months of World War II, American bombing raids claimed the lives of more than 900,000 Japanese civilians—not counting the casualties from the atomic strikes against Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This is more than twice the total number of combat deaths that the United States has suffered in all its foreign wars combined.

On one night, that of March 9-10, 1945, 234 Superfortresses dropped 1,167 tons of incendiary bombs over downtown Tokyo; 83,793 Japanese bodies were found in the charred remains—a number greater than the 80,942 combat fatalities that the United States sustained in the Korean and Vietnam Wars combined.

Since the Second World War, the United States has continued to employ devastating force against both civilian and military targets. Out of a pre-war population of 9.49 million, an estimated 1 million North Korean civilians are believed to have died as a result of U.S. actions during the 1950-53 conflict. During the same war, 33,870 American soldiers died in combat, meaning that U.S. forces killed approximately thirty North Korean civilians for every American soldier who died in action. The United States dropped almost three times as much explosive tonnage in the Vietnam War as was used in the Second World War, and something on the order of 365,000 Vietnamese civilians are believed to have been killed during the period of American involvement.
While this is a very long article, a "white paper" is perhaps more appropriate, your time will be well spent.

In The National Interest
 


2:49 AM / Editor / permalink    0 comments  



Saturday, January 17, 2004

Cheney the Great & Cohorts Inc.

Cheney the Great & Cohorts Inc. This small story will grow and grow, folks. Believe me, I know the truly dead-rot subculture of the people and companies involved. When all is said and done, Cheney, Dubya & Twigs will rival the presidency of U.S. Grant for blatantly arrogant corruption and cronyism.
WASHINGTON, Jan. 16 - Three Democratic lawmakers said Friday that the Pentagon's inspector general was investigating possible criminal violations involving fuel shipped to Iraq by Halliburton, the company once headed by Vice President Dick Cheney.

The lawmakers said they had been told by the inspector general's staff on Thursday that an issue of overcharging by Halliburton's Kellogg Brown & Root unit was with the inspector general's Defense Criminal Investigative Service.

The inspector general's office declined to comment.

The information about a criminal investigation was released in a letter by Senator Joseph I. Lieberman of Connecticut and Representatives Henry A. Waxman of California and John D. Dingell of Michigan.
The New York Times
 


10:59 PM / Editor / permalink    0 comments  




The Peking Duck: The Republicans are invincible

Richard, the author and proprietor of The Peking Duck, has a must-read post:
"I see no hope. They will stop at nothing and are so well coordinated and in perfect lockstep with one another (including the Republican media) that they can get away with just about anything. They are the new Macchiavelians, and Little Boy Bush is Il Principe. I've never been so depressed about US politics before, and I'm afraid we have little choice but to resign ourselves to more of the same, and worse, for years and years to come."
This is only a snippet, please do the world a favor and visit The Peking Duck. NOW.
 


1:14 PM / Editor / permalink    0 comments  




Krugman Gets It

Paul Krugman gets it. I'm just not sure that the two men he primarily writes about in his column get it. I will say this: Somebody had better get it. I know some of you are probably getting tired of me republishing my piece "Give Me That Old Time Liberalism" every 4 weeks. But I am going to keep doing it until somebody steps forward and truly starts leading America again.

Ladies and gentlemen, I believe with an absolutely frightening certainty that America is in more danger today than at any time since the assassination of President Kennedy or the firing on Fort Sumter. That's right, a danger from within, not from without. We are teetering on a razor-sharp moment in time. Twice before when this nation faced those crucial moments, moments when our Republic could have disintegrated, spiraling in pieces past a point of no return, we were saved by that which separates us from every other nation on earth, our Constitution, the rule of law and ideals, not ideology.

And I am not talking about the little nit-picky kind of law so loved by nit-picky little minds, minds that are more concerned with whom we are sleeping, what we are smoking, what we are reading, what we are watching, than who we are and what we stand for in this world that really is looking to us for leadership even though it will mostly not voice it. The world will not voice it because it is so hard to reconcile what the documents and the monuments and the literature and so many of our movies and plays say we are with what the world sees that we are. And what do these less fortunate nations see? They see us out of fear belie those documents, those monuments, the literature, the great dramas that they want to believe are true but learn every day that they aren't. They learn this because they see that we are hysterically afraid of some new witch-doctor with ancient ideas that empower desperate young minds to blow themselves and us into body parts only because we are afraid and they see it and are empowered all the more. We are not hated for our ideals; we are hated because we do not live up to our ideals. It is a fact, folks, and no one is talking about it. This world would be a better, safer place in a heartbeat of time if we actually were what our great founders and writers and statesmen and thinkers and artists have so wonderfully but futilely said we were. You think about it. And read Paul Krugman.
Earlier this week, Wesley Clark had some strong words about the state of the nation. "I think we're at risk with our democracy," he said. 'I think we're dealing with the most closed, imperialistic, nastiest administration in living memory. They even put Richard Nixon to shame."

In other words, the general gets it: he understands that America is facing what Kevin Phillips, in his remarkable new book, "American Dynasty," calls a "Machiavellian moment." Among other things, this tells us that General Clark and Howard Dean, whatever they may say in the heat of the nomination fight, are on the same side of the great Democratic divide.

Most political reporting on the Democratic race, it seems to me, has gotten it wrong. Some journalists do, of course, insist on trivializing the whole thing: what I dread most, in the event of an upset in Iowa, is the return of reporting about the political significance of John Kerry's hair.

But even those who refrain from turning political reporting into gossip have used the wrong categories. Again and again, one reads that it's about the left wing of the Democratic party versus the centrists; but Mr. Dean was a very centrist governor, and his policy proposals are not obviously more liberal than those of his rivals.

The real division in the race for the Democratic nomination is between those who are willing to question not just the policies but also the honesty and the motives of the people running our country, and those who aren't.

What makes Mr. Dean seem radical aren't his policy positions but his willingness -- shared, we now know, by General Clark -- to take a hard line against the Bush administration. This horrifies some veterans of the Clinton years, who have nostalgic memories of elections that were won by emphasizing the positive. Indeed, George Bush's handlers have already made it clear that they intend to make his "optimism" -- as opposed to the negativism of his angry opponents -- a campaign theme. (Money-saving suggestion: let's cut directly to the scene where Mr. Bush dresses up as an astronaut, and skip the rest of his expensive, pointless -- but optimistic! -- Moon-base program.)

But even Bill Clinton couldn't run a successful Clinton-style campaign this year, for several reasons.

One is that the Democratic candidate, no matter how business-friendly, will not be able to get lots of corporate contributions, as Clinton did. In the Clinton era, a Democrat could still raise a lot of money from business, partly because there really are liberal businessmen, partly because donors wanted to hedge their bets. But these days the Republicans control all three branches of government and exercise that control ruthlessly. Even corporate types who have grave misgivings about the Bush administration -- a much larger group than you might think ? are afraid to give money to Democrats.

Another is that the Bush people really are Nixonian. The bogus security investigation over Ron Suskind's "The Price of Loyalty," like the outing of Valerie Plame, shows the lengths they're willing to go to in intimidating their critics. (In the case of Paul O'Neill, alas, the intimidation seems to be working.) A mild-mannered, upbeat candidate would get eaten alive.

Finally, any Democrat has to expect not just severely slanted coverage from the fair and balanced Republican media, but asymmetric treatment even from the mainstream media. For example, some have said that the intense scrutiny of Mr. Dean's Vermont record is what every governor who runs for president faces. No, it isn't. I've looked at press coverage of questions surrounding Mr. Bush's tenure in Austin, like the investment of state university funds with Republican donors; he got a free pass during the 2000 campaign.

So what's the answer? A Democratic candidate will have a chance of winning only if he has an energized base, willing to contribute money in many small donations, willing to contribute their own time, willing to stand up for the candidate in the face of smear tactics and unfair coverage.

That doesn't mean that the Democratic candidate has to be a radical ? which is a good thing for the party, since all of the candidates are actually quite moderate. In fact, what the party needs is a candidate who inspires the base enough to get out the message that he isn't a radical ? and that Mr. Bush is.

The New York Times
 


4:17 AM / Editor / permalink    0 comments  




This Genie Ain't Going Back Into The Bottle...

The New Cultural Revolution, Folks, welcome to it!



Zhang Ziyi: Rising movie star
Click for more, courtesy of the state-owned press

Xinhuanet.com
 


2:54 AM / Editor / permalink    0 comments  




"What's that you say, Zem...can't trust the French?"

"The French speak with forked tongue, huh, Zem? I'll pass that along to Colin. How's the modernization of the PLA comin'...? Uh, yeah...another time, of course, sorry 'bout that. So...what's my chances with that cutie right behind me?"


Jiang Zemin (R), chairman of the Chinese Central Military Commission, talks with Richard Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the US armed forces, in Beijing, Jan. 15, 2004. (Xinhua Photo)
 


2:10 AM / Editor / permalink    0 comments  




Spies...?

I hope you don't recognize any of these men, their days left on this earth are few and will surely be unpleasant. What I really hope is that they are indeed guilty of the charges. Please read that sentence carefully before having a knee-jerk reaction such as that of me wishing the worst upon fellow citizens of this Earth. Of course, with my relative lack of experience in what happens to Taiwanese spies in such a complex situation, I could be reading the potential consequences from an irrelevant viewpoint: since Taiwan is a "Province" of the People's Republic of China, then they can hardly be labeled as espionage agents of a foreign country. Can they be labeled as domestic industrial spies? How draconian should the sentences be if Beijing wants not to inflame Taiwanese voters before the March "elections"? The unpleasantries aside, from a jurisprudence perspective, the more I ponder it, this is a most interesting case.
Eight Taiwan residents detained by China's state security department are spies sent by the military intelligence authorities of Taiwan, the Taiwan Affairs Office under the State Council said.






They were Fu Hongzhang, Lin Jieshan, Song Xiaolian, Wang Changyong, Zhang Genghuan, Zhang Yuren, Tong Taiping and Li Xiangheng.

Tong Taiping was caught on Dec. 4, 2003, by security guards while collecting intelligence at the Guangzhou Huangpu Shipyard.

The others were detained on Dec. 15, 2003, for interrogation on suspicion of collecting military intelligence in Guangdong, Fujian, Anhui and Hainan provinces.

The investigation is now underway.

The Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits has informed the Foundation for Exchange Across the Taiwan Straits of the spies' situation.
China Daily
 


12:41 AM / Editor / permalink    0 comments  



Friday, January 16, 2004

The Truth is...

Let's be honest, if Dr. King was still alive, Bush would have his attack dogs all over him, and his every move would be investigated. This stop in Atlanta for a photo-op is disgusting to me and many others who were in the civil rights movement in the south while the Bush family was no where to be found.
ATLANTA, Jan. 15 - President Bush made a swing through the South on Thursday with an appeal to black voters, but encountered emotional protests when he stopped here to lay a wreath at the grave of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

Mr. Bush was met by hundreds of demonstrators when he arrived at The King Center to mark the 75th anniversary of Dr. King's birth. He was shielded from their view by a row of transit-authority buses with police officers in riot gear atop them, according to the pool reporter who accompanied the president into the center.

But the chants and boos of the protesters were audible as Mr. Bush, accompanied by Dr. King's widow, Coretta Scott King, and his sister, Christine King Farris, approached the crypt, laid the wreath and paused briefly in prayer before leaving without making any public remarks.

Outside, the protesters chanted "Bush go home" and "Peace, not war."

Before Mr. Bush's arrival for the 15-minute stop, some of the protesters broke through barriers around the center. Two arrests were made, the Atlanta police said, and the incident prompted the authorities to place the buses between the demonstrators and the president.

The White House had arranged for Mr. Bush to stop at Dr. King's grave on a day when the president was scheduled to be in Atlanta for a fund-raiser. Sheriee Bowman, a spokeswoman for the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, said the group respected the president's right to pay tribute to Dr. King. But she suggested that the civil rights organization saw Mr. Bush's presence as politically motivated.

"We question the integrity of the timing of the move because last year at this time he took a stand against affirmative action, the Michigan case, which is part of Dr. King's legacy," Ms. Bowman said, referring to the Supreme Court case that considered the use of race in college admissions.
There is a lot more in this article, if you have the stomach for his speech, it's in The New York Times...
 


8:18 PM / Editor / permalink    0 comments  




The Lady Wants To Know

Ms. Jane Harman is no wacky conspiracy theorist; she is level-headed, smart, and responsible to her position in Congress, her constituents and her country. When she starts asking these hard but obvious questions, the administration would be wise to listen and answer, not sic their usual attack teams on her. Before coming to China, I lived in Los Angeles for a decade; I have some knowledge of Ms. Harman. I really don't think Shrub & Twigs want to tangle with her. While they probably aren't seriously counting on carrying California come November, they still would like not to be embarrassed there. She can do that to Dubya any day of the week and twice on Sunday, I don't care if he goes to breakfast prayer meeting, Sunday morning Bible school and evening services to boot.
WASHINGTON, Jan. 15 - The top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee is calling on President Bush to provide a public accounting next week of why prewar American intelligence assessments that Iraq possessed illicit weapons now appear to have been mistaken.

Mr. Bush should use his State of the Union address on Tuesday "to acknowledge the problems and outline specific steps to fix them," Representative Jane Harman of California will say in a speech in Los Angeles, according to an advance text provided by her office.

But Ms. Harman, whose position on the intelligence committee gives her access to highly classified intelligence briefings, says in the advance text of her speech that the intelligence agencies "connected the dots to the wrong conclusions."

The planned criticism by Ms. Harman, in a speech to the Los Angeles World Affairs Council, is expected to be the sharpest yet from a leader of the panel that oversees the Central Intelligence Agency. It comes a year after Mr. Bush devoted much of his State of the Union address in 2003 to portray what he called "a serious and mounting threat to our country" posed by Iraq's possession of illicit weapons.

"If our intelligence products had been better, I believe many policy makers, including me, would have had a far clearer picture of the sketchiness of our sources on Iraq's W.M.D. programs, and our lack of certainty about Iraq's chemical, biological and nuclear capabilities," the speech reads, using an abbreviation for the phrase "weapons of mass destruction." ...

The Harman speech does say that "there were good reasons to support regime change in Iraq" and notes that Iraq had repeatedly violated United Nations resolutions by failing to prove after the Persian Gulf war of 1991 that it had dismantled the illicit weapons and weapons programs that were discovered to be part of its arsenal at that time.
There is a great deal more in this article you should read, it's in The New York Times...
 


7:57 PM / Editor / permalink    0 comments  




A Gem...

Conrad, the proprietor and author of The Gweilo Diaries, has discovered another gem and, no, it has nothing to do with feminine pulchritude--for an unusual but delightful exhibition of that you will need to scroll down just a tad. The gem I write of here is of the literary sort--blogging literature, as in good online writing, I should hasten to add in fear of chasing away any folks wishing not to be assaulted by highbrow pretensions. In short, I strongly suggest you give the following post a clickity-click:
"Welcome Functional Ambivalent to The Gweilo Diaries blogroll. Why? Because the sonofabitch can flat out write, that's why. "
I wish to add a bit of personal commentary on the subject, nay, the profession and sub-culture, that is the topic of both links, here and here. As with much personal writing, I must begin with a confession. Unlike a very large majority of people, I have great affinity for lawyers and the law, most particularly lawyers in the criminal justice business--both prosecutors and defense attorneys. While I did not follow one of my ambitions and receive the law degree I fully planned on acquiring at some point in my collection of degrees, I spent some 20 years writing extensively about murder, in the process covering most of the high-profile murder cases in America during those years. However, what most folks don't know is that I worked many, many criminal cases that were never heard of outside of the town or county which had jurisdiction over them. Many of these were cases that I was not able to publish articles or books on but worked anyway, pro bono, as it were, because there was a need for an objective journalist to work within the framework of our adversarial system. Just the fact that I was on the case, that "the press" was there, was beneficial and almost always appreciated by both sides of the Law & Order divide.

My point? During those years I worked with hundreds of lawyers, detectives and investigators on both sides of our system and I can attest to the fact that the overwhelming majority of these men and women were and are dedicated to truth and justice. You mostly only hear about the cases that were aberrations of the system, cases where the system broke down, and usually not at the fault of an attorney, although he or she will too often get the blame. They are a tiny fraction of the total. And these men and women of the big-ticket cases where there is or was hue and cry one way or the other by the public? I have worked with just about every famous lawyer and prosecutor in America, almost all of whom I call friend--and they too care greatly that our system works at it is intended to work.

I will now step down from my soap-box. I just wanted to write my mind, and in my mind lawyers are the front-line soldiers protecting your freedoms. You may not like them now--but you sure will if you are ever accused of a crime, particularly if it is a crime you did not commit. The law, folks, is a noble profession, regardless of what you might think.

Check out this post in The Gweilo Diaries
 


7:04 PM / Editor / permalink    0 comments  




Diversions...

Let's face it, some days are better than others. And some days you just have to say to hell with it and look around for some flowers to smell, or some other such diversion that strikes your fancy. Did I write "diversion"? So I did. Why? Go have a click on The Gweilo Diaries and see...
Thursday's Diversion
...what diverted me.
 


12:13 AM / Editor / permalink    0 comments  



Thursday, January 15, 2004

Friedman: War of Ideas, Part 3

I believe Thomas L. Friedman's views on the war in Iraq are an important part of the necessary collective "dialogue" we are having with ourselves if nothing else. This is installment number 3 in a 5 part series, reproduced in full below:
During the next six months, the world is going to be treated to two remarkable trials in Baghdad. It is going to be the mother of all split screens. On one side, you're going to see the trial of Saddam Hussein. On the other side, you're going to see the trial of the Iraqi people. That's right, the Iraqi people will also be on trial — for whether they can really live together without the iron fist of the man on the other side of the screen.

This may be apocryphal, but Saddam is supposed to have once remarked something like: Be careful, if you get rid of me, you will need seven presidents to rule Iraq. Which is why this split-screen trial is going to be so important. Either Saddam is going to be laughing at us and at Iraqis, saying "I told you so," as Iraqis are squabbling and murdering each other on the other side of the screen.

Or, we and the Iraqi people will be laughing at him by proving that it is possible to produce something the Arab world has rarely seen: a self-governing, multiethnic, representative Arab government that accepts minority rights and peaceful transfers of power — without a military dictator, monarch or mullah standing overhead with a stick.

You don't want to miss this show. This is pay-per-view history. If, somehow, Iraqi Kurds, Sunnis, Turkmen, Christians, Assyrians and Shiites find a way to embrace pluralism, it will be a huge boost to moderates in the war of ideas all across the Muslim world. Those who scoff at the idea of a democratic domino theory in the Arab world don't know what they're talking about. But those who think this is a done deal don't know Iraq.

If Iraq is going to be made to work as a decent, pluralistic, self-governing entity, noted the Iraq expert Amatzia Baram of the United States Institute of Peace, all the key factions there will have to accept being "reasonably unhappy." All will have to settle for their second-best dream in order to avoid their first-class nightmare: chaos or a return to tyranny.

Islamists will have to accept being unhappy that the system does not mandate Sharia law as the constitution, but only "reasonably" unhappy, because Islam will be the official religion of the state and respected as an important basis for legislation and governance. Secularists will have to accept being unhappy that Iraq's new basic law gives Islam an important symbolic place in governance, but only "reasonably" unhappy, because this secular law and judges will still provide the basis for a new rule of law. Kurds will have to accept being very unhappy not to achieve their dream of an independent Kurdistan, but only "reasonably" unhappy, because the special autonomous status of the Kurdish region will be concretized in Iraqi law.

The Sunnis will have to accept being unhappy that they are no longer controlling Iraq and its oil wealth, but only "reasonably" unhappy, because they will discover that they still have a significant role in the parliament, and a share of the nation's oil wealth in their own provinces, thanks to the new Iraqi federalism. The Shiites will be unhappy that, now when their majority political status will finally be realized, power and resources are going to be diffused throughout a federal system and constraints are going to be placed on the power of the majority. But they will only have to be "reasonably" unhappy, because there will eventually be a Shiite head of government, and the very federalism that disperses power and resources will also enable Shiite provinces that wish to adopt a more Islamist form of government to do so.

"Let us put aside the literary phrase `We are brothers but others are dividing us,' " wrote the thoughtful Arab columnist Hazem Saghieh in Al Hayat. "We in Iraq and elsewhere are not brothers — there are problems we inherited from our own history and social makeup, which were not helped by oppressive modern regimes. . . . Let's be frank: the Shiites today scare the Sunnis; the Sunnis and the Shiites together scare the Kurds; and the Kurds scare the other minorities. . . . All the ethnic groups of Iraq have the responsibility of putting nation-building above their selfish and conflicting calculations."

In short, our most serious long-term enemy in Iraq may not be the Iraqi insurgents, but the Iraqi people. Can they live together reasonably unhappy at first, and then grow reasonably happy? If they can, we will be Iraq's temporary midwife, helping give birth to its democracy. If they can't, we will be Iraq's new, always unhappy, baby sitter, and the old one, Saddam Hussein, will be laughing at us all the way to the gallows.
The New York Times
 


11:42 PM / Editor / permalink    0 comments  




Too Close To Uncle Sam?

Too close to Uncle Sam? South Korea? What's with this? South Korea being too close to Uncle Sam is oxymoronic in the extreme: There would be no South Korea if the lower half of that perennially turbulent peninsula hadn't long ago placed all its kim chee in the good Uncle's basket. I think independent thought and national pride and going your own way in life and national politics are all laudable concepts--but sacking a foreign minister who counsels maintaining close ties to the dude that brought you to the dance!

It's bad enough that we have to live with the reality that a whole lot of people and countries really hope we go to hell in a suicide-bomber's hand basket, but this is too much, folks. Seriously. This is a whole lot like a public slap in the face from a spoiled brat you over-indulged. Read the piece below and see how it strikes you, particularly if you're old enough to remember Ike's golf swing, or hip enough to have watched MASH in reruns.
SEOUL, South Korea (AP) -- South Korea's foreign minister resigned Thursday because of a rift between ministry officials and President Roh Moo-hyun over the country's close ties to the United States.

The division comes at a critical time as South Korea and the United States wrangle with North Korea over its nuclear weapons programs and discuss sending South Korean troops to help the U.S.-led coalition in Iraq.

Roh accepted the resignation of Yoon Young-kwan, saying the Foreign Ministry was not fully backing his administration's policy of independence from Washington. The human rights lawyer-turned-politician took office a year ago promising not to "kowtow to the Americans'' and gain equal footing with the country's top ally.

"Some Foreign Ministry officials have failed to shake off the old foreign policy that tended to depend on foreign countries, failed to fully understand the spirit and course of the (Roh) government's new foreign policy of independence, and repeatedly made remarks that went against national interests in private and public occasions,'' said Roh senior aide Jeong Chan-yong.

Local media reported that several officials in the ministry's elite North American affairs division, which handles U.S. relations, criticized Roh's policy as unrealistic.

Jeong said the foreign minister resigned to take responsibility for failing to rein in those critics.

Roh said Wednesday he would transfer those officials who criticized his foreign policy.

"Several times, they have been asked to follow the president's policy,'' Roh said. "Some of them responded with objections to the president's foreign policy and expressed their discontent with insulting comments.''

The Yonhap news agency said some members of Roh's National Security Council accused the foreign minister of leaning too much toward the United States.

Yoon defended the importance of the U.S. alliance, saying relations with Washington were "very useful'' in resolving such issues the standoff with North Korea.

Yoon noted that the divided Koreas are still technically at war since the 1950-1953 Korean War ended in a cease-fire and not a treaty.

"So far we have maintained peace (on the peninsula) through alliance (with the United States) and I had said the alliance was important as we are in a situation where complete peace between the two Koreas has not yet been achieved,'' he said.

Yoon dismissed criticism that he has been "worshipping the United States,'' but he said it was important for diplomats to carry out the wishes of the government.

"Diplomats are people who implement the president's philosophy on state affairs by serving as his hands and feet,'' Yoon said. "In that sense, I feel deeply sorry.''

The presidential Blue House office has not said who will replace Yoon.
The New York Times
 


11:02 PM / Editor / permalink    0 comments  




Jiang & Myers

Jiang & Myers isn't a law firm; it isn't a comedy act; it isn't a hip-hop band; it isn't a new detergent. I'll be damned if I know exactly what it is. I know what it means, if that's any help. It means Jiang Zemin is still very much in the China picture. And I'm not at all sure that's a happy picture, all things considered.
China values the commitment of the government of the United States, and hopes the US will continue its constructive role in the peaceful settlement of the Taiwan issue, said a Chinese military leader on Jan. 15.

Jiang Zemin, chairman of the Central Military Commission, met with Richard Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the US armed forces, and stressed that the Taiwan issue is the most important and sensitive issue in Sino-US relations.

Jiang said that Sino-US relations had developed although ups and downs still existed since the two countries forged diplomatic ties 25 years ago.

He said that both China and the US are major powers of the world, and with different domestic situations, the two countries have differences on some issues, but they also shared common interests.

The development of Sino-US constructive and cooperative relations conforms to the fundamental interest of the two peoples, and is conducive to world peace and stability as well, Jiang said.

He said that Sino-US relations have maintained good momentum, and the two sides should deal with the relationship from the strategic and long-term viewpoint, expand consensus, reduce differences, and solve problems, to push forward a healthy and stable bilateral relationship.

Myers said that during the visit, he has good talks with Chinese military leaders on US-China military relations and the international and regional security situation, and the two sides had reached consensus.
He said that the US is satisfied with the military relationship, and is ready to work with China to continue the existing momentum.

Myers arrived here Jan. 12 on an official visit to China. Guo Boxiong, vice-chairman of the CMC, and Cao Gangchuan, CMC vice-chairman, state councilor and minister of defense of China, met with Myers on Jan. 14.
There is much more to this article in the People's Daily.
 


7:01 PM / Editor / permalink    0 comments  




Kennedy Takes Off the Gloves

Senator Kennedy is as righteously, eloquently angry as only a handful of American political figures can pull off with any authenticity in these days of tepid, weather-vane leadership. Whether you agree with "Teddy" or not, whether you admire him or detest him as so many on the right do, you cannot deny that he can rattle the rafters when he has a mind to. I am sure it will not surprise any of you that I count myself among his admirers--I worked briefly on one of his abbreviated presidential forays so long ago that neither of us had any grey hair, at least that I knew about.

He can make this speech with even more authority since he did not vote for the war authorization in the senate. Whoa. You say. Because again it is no surprise that I have long been in favor of bringing down Saddam Hussein--that in fact I believe it was more than a decade too late in coming (how many Iraqi citizens would still be among the living if Bush the First had made the right choice instead of the cynically geopolitical one?). So why am I applauding a rousing speech Ted Kennedy made denouncing Bush on the war? Because Bush lied to everyone, perhaps even himself, because he did not trust American citizens to do the right thing when they are given the facts. The man preaches democracy, yet does not practice the most essential element for it to work as it should: an informed citizenry.
President Bush marketed the war on Iraq as a "political product" to influence the 2002 elections and is doing so again this year, Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.) charged yesterday in a scathing speech accusing Bush of putting politics ahead of national security.

In a speech to the liberal Center for American Progress, Kennedy said the war has increased hatred for the United States abroad, diverted attention from the broader war against terrorism and put the country more "at risk" than it was before.

Kennedy, a leading Democratic liberal who was among the small minority of lawmakers to vote against the congressional authorization for war in 2002, has been criticizing Bush on Iraq for months, but rarely in such a sweeping fashion. He accused the administration of distorting intelligence and pursuing an ideological agenda in building the case for war.

"No president of the United States should employ misguided ideology and distortion of the truth to take the nation to war," he said. "In doing so, the president broke the basic bond of trust between the government and the people. If Congress and the American people knew the whole truth, America would never have gone to war."

House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Tex.) denounced the speech, calling it a "hateful attack against the commander in chief." He said Kennedy "insulted the president's patriotism, accused the Republican Party of treason, and resurrected the weak and indecisive foreign policy of Jimmy Carter and Michael Dukakis."

Kennedy referred approvingly to an assertion by former Treasury secretary Paul H. O'Neill in a new book that Bush began planning for war against Iraq shortly after taking office in 2001. Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld has denied the assertion, but Kennedy indicated he believes it, praising O'Neill's "integrity, intelligence and vision" and saying the book has "now revealed what many of us have long suspected."

Kennedy said "the steamroller of war was moving into high gear" by fall of 2002. "The administration insisted that Congress vote to authorize the war before it adjourned for the November elections. Why? Because the debate in Congress would distract attention from the troubled economy and the troubled effort to capture [al Qaeda leader Osama] bin Laden. The strategy was to focus on Iraq and do so in a way that would divide the Congress. And it worked."

Now, Kennedy said, "there is little doubt as well that the administration's plan to transfer sovereignty to the Iraqi people by this summer -- and the pressure to hold elections in Afghanistan at that time -- are intended to build momentum for the November elections in this country." The war, he said, "could well become one of the worst blunders in more than two centuries of American foreign policy."
Washington Post
 


6:46 PM / Editor / permalink    0 comments  




Times Really Are Changing

When one of my writing students chose homosexuality in China for her final research paper at Xiamen University last spring, just the fact she had proposed it as her thesis became a ricocheting rumor on a campus of almost 20,000. The fact that I approved the topic was worth another wave of gossip, rebounding the length and breadth of the sprawling, otherwise tranquil university. Being gay in China was still very much a closet story.

So what is in today's China Daily? Read on...
The metaphysics of film

Satisfied with his approach to making art films, Cui Zi'en is not afraid to be himself. The China's foremost homosexual author and filmmaker is enjoying success one quiet work at a time, writes Michelle Qiao.

Purple silk Chinese jacket, lake-blue scarf, a tiny silver earring, light makeup around the eyes and lips plus a gentle voice --all these make it hard to tell the gender of writer/director Cui Zi'en at first sight.

As one of the earliest people in the Chinese mainland to share his homosexuality with the public, Cui says he prefers not to classify himself. "People have an unfortunate habit of separating themselves into only two sexes -- male and female,'' Cui says, whose 12 movies were screened at DDM Warehouse last week.

"For me, there are at least three genders in the world, and probably four. From the point of view of an alien, human beings dividing themselves into genders must seem funny and very unintelligent.'' Cui did create an alien from Mars in his newest movie, "Star Appeal,'' to challenge what he views as the outdated concept of sexuality. The film revolves around an unusual love story.

A boy from Mars named ET meets a pair of lovers on Earth, Xiaobo (male) and Wenwen (female). Without knowing any of the workings of love on Earth, ET finally falls in love with Xiaobo and convinces him to reciprocate. "Traditionally sex happens when the love between two people reaches a climax,'' says Cui. "I try to avoid this outdated tradition.

The sex in this movie happens in a quiet mood, after they discuss human beings' ways of expressing love: how they caress and kiss, how sex is accomplished. Without any feeling of dramatic climax, the sex in the film is psychological, while discussion is the most profound way in expressing love.

The sex comes from ideas, not from desires.'' Frequently using obscure post-modern terminology, Cui adds that in this modern society of mass production and unoriginality, the simplest way of expressing love has been neglected by most people, who can hug, kiss and have sex at will. Therefore he used an alien ignorant of even kissing to remind the audience how to express their love. "The actors and actress speak in kiddy talk (in Star Appeal),'' says Cui.

"Their psychological age is under 10. I try to remake childhood for the audience.'' Although Cui says this movie is his easiest to understand, as it contains some dramatic elements, it still might be too much for ordinary audience.

After the screening, audience members contributed their feedback.

"I think the movie should be shortened to 15 minutes,'' one person suggested. It may not have been a bad idea, as it is a startling slow film, with long and childish dialogue and sometimes jumpy scenes, mostly accompanied with only natural noise as background. Cui defends his work. "Ordinary film is driven by drama, but mine is driven by talk and ideas,'' he explains.

"Traditional film creates gorgeous, complicated, high-tech scenes, which may be designed to push people to seek enlightened moments; they are ambitious to be the first, the most powerful and the most wealthy, and they overlook their most essential human nature.

I try to show the audience only simple scenes.'' Cui is also quick to note that although film is subject to being considered as art, many popular films are produced with the only interest being potential box office yields.

"We should not make movies simply for money,'' he says. "When audiences leave the cinema, they should have gained something from the film they just watched.''

"He lavishly uses a lot of still scenes, with moving scenes only appearing at the end,'' says Wu Hao, a TV journalist. "This is a metaphorical film. Furthermore, even though it is very esoteric, it is more understandable to me than some European art films. I agree with Cui's opinion that complicated scenes in commercial films have ruined the audience's taste. I think his film was not made to please but rather as a response, as a call for the reformation of taste.'' Born in 1958 to a Catholic family in Harbin, Heilongjiang Province, northeastern China, Cui was baptized when he was two months old and has remained a Catholic for his whole life. "The first memory I have is the image of Jesus on the cover of the Bible at my home,'' Cui recalls.

"My father is a surgeon, and therefore I saw him as a god. I believed, like God, he could save everyone. Whenever a friend of mine was ill, I took him to my father to save. When I finally realized that he was not capable of saving everyone, I was disappointed for a very long time.'' After receiving a master's degree in literature from the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Cui began teaching literature and screenwriting at the Beijing Film Academy.

Now he is also a film critic and a screenwriter as well as an associate professor at the Theory Study Office in the film academy. In a sense, his works are a summary of homosexuality, threaded together through movies and literature that express his inner-most aspirations -- to show homosexuality as normal and to directly address homosexual love and sex.

"I think the world contains many different things, and we must maintain this variety,'' says Cui. "If the world becomes dominated by one mindset, by straight or gay people, human beings will soon go the way of the dinosaur.'' Cui published his first novel that dealt with homosexuality, "Pink Lip'' ("Taose Zuichun''), in China in 1997 and declared his sexual preference to the media. Dai Jinhua, a literature professor at Peking University, once commented that "Reading this novel is like gliding under moonlight. After getting over the initial shock, you will encounter a derailed yet beautiful world.''

In 2000 Cui and a Chinese lesbian painter took part in a program at Hunan Network TV Station, the first homosexuality-themed talk show in the Chinese mainland. Also in that year his novel "Uncle's Life'' won the Best Radio Fiction Award at the Deutschen Welle (Voice of Germany) Prize for Literature. Another one of his films, "Old Testament,'' which follows three tales of homosexuality in China, was an entry in the 53rd Berlin Film Festival last year. "He is a rare director with a childish heart,'' says Andrew Cheng, a local director, Cui's good friend and collaborator. "He is a very kind, gentle person who writes incisive works."

He is considered to be a strange man by some, a Chinese version of the pioneering British director Derek Jarman. "I appreciate his insistence in sticking with what he believes,'' Cheng adds. "No matter how difficult, he has always stayed true to his vision.

He is a unique scholar, someone who is not afraid to be himself, and, in doing so, he has also opened the door for many other Chinese filmmakers.'' Cui prefers to focus on his creativity rather than on his homosexuality.

"When I create, I often close my eyes and let the thoughts flow, let the natural light from the center of my heart illuminate me,'' says Cui, meditatively. "My films have the power to guide me to a clean and sacred realm.''
China Daily
 


1:39 AM / Editor / permalink    0 comments  




It Happened In China Today

Sex demand rejected, man refuses to pay bill.
( 2004-01-14 10:45) (China Daily)

A man who failed to obtain sexual favours at a barber shop refused to pay the massage bill and even called the police for help, reports China West Metropolis Daily.

Zhang, a native of Southwest China's Sichuan Province, asked for sex after having a massage on Sunday. But when his request was turned down by the masseuse, Zhang got into a fight and refused to pay.

Both of them were taken to the local police station.
Sexual toys attract teens, annoy parents
( 2004-01-14 09:23) (China Daily)

Blinking her bewitching eyes, a girl exposes her upper body and caresses a breast. It is among the many pornographic dolls that have swarmed the toy market of Shenyang, capital of Northeast China's Liaoning Province, Liaoshen Evening News reports

They have become a headache for parents, who are trying to prevent their children from being lured by pornographic materials since most of the buyers are primary- or middle-school students.

Police should decide whether the toys should be classified as pornographic materials but they are definitely not suited for children, said an official from local industrial and commercial department.
Man seizes car of mistress' lover
( 2004-01-14 10:45) (China Daily)

Enraged by his mistress "love affair" with another man, a man is demanding compensation from the intruder and seized his car as "security." Pan, 45, faces legal proceedings launched by Shijingshan District Procurate on Monday.

Pan met the teenage girl at a beauty salon in February and cohabited with her in a rented house; he gave her hundreds of yuan for living expenses every month.

When he discovered that she was dating Kang, the angry man seized the latter's car, saying he would return it only after he coughed up 30,000 yuan (US$3,600).
Plunging suicidal woman crushes husband to death
( 2004-01-14 10:45) (China Daily)

A woman in Shenyang, capital of Northeast China's Liaoning Province, killed herself on Sunday by leaping from the 21st floor of a building; and crushed her husband 'who was attempting to catch her at the foot of the building 'to death, Shenyang Jinbao reports.

The woman's mother is reported to have witnessed the tragedy when she rushed to the building after the woman called her before she leapt, saying she "has found a good destination for herself." The 35-year-old woman allegedly suffered from depression and tried to commit suicide several times.

The couple leave behind a seven-year-old son.
China Daily
 


12:41 AM / Editor / permalink    0 comments  



Wednesday, January 14, 2004

Big Brass In Beijing, American Style

The Importance of China to the U.S.? While running two wars, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff makes time for a visit.

The United State's highest ranking military officer, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Richard Myers, arrived in Beijing late Tuesday for the highest level military visit to China since the mid-air collision of a US scout plane EP-3 with a Chinese fighter over the South China Sea in 2001.

On Wednesday, Myers is scheduled to meet his Chinese counterpart General Liang Guanglie, Chinese Defence Minister General Cao Gangchuan and Central Military Commission Vice-Chairman General Guo Boxiong, according to US officials.

"General Myers' visit is an important step in a series of US-China military activities, including high-level visits, confidence-building measures and professional exchanges," a written statement released Tuesday by the US embassy to China said.

Foreign Ministry spokesman Kong Quan said Tuesday Myers' visit is a very important one starting off the new year.

"We believe that through this visit we can deepen understanding between the two militaries, expand bilateral consensus and develop bilateral friendship while also promoting the healthy and stable development of Sino-US military relations," Kong said at a regular news conference.
Liang Guanglie (L), chief of General Staff of the PLA talks with U.S. Air Force General Richard Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in Beijing January 14, 2004. During his two-day visit, Myers will meet with Chinese military leaders and government leaders. Mutual military exchanges, security co-operation, and Taiwan question are expected to be touched upon.
China Daily
 


11:06 PM / Editor / permalink    0 comments  




My Rose Colored Glasses

I really don't want to take off the rose-colored glasses through which I have been viewing China for going on two years now. But what am I to say to myself when I go to The Gweilo Diaries and see the truth behind this post:
"Too Busy Harassing Dissidents Perhaps.

China offers us the irony of a crime-ridden police state."
My only response is that I have experienced not even a moment when I thought about crime or the fear of crime during my time in China. Yes, I was in the beautiful, tranquil Xiamen, Fujian, for a year, where even car horns are banned and the drivers, including cabbies, obeyed the law. Not so much as a pick-pocket have I witnessed in our travels all over Hainan, and Yunnan, and now half-a-year in Beijing. But there are facts and stats such as these:
Shenzhen, the mushrooming shopping and nightlife boomtown just across the mainland Chinese border from Hong Kong, is seeing yet another growth industry flourish on its streets: serious crime.

According to official media, the city's crime rate soared 57 percent in 2003, Hong Kong's South China Morning Post reports.

Kidnappings alone rose 75 percent, the Post said, quoting the Southern Metropolitan News. In all more than 100,000 crimes were recorded during 2003 in the city of 2.5 million people.
Channelnewsasia.com
 


10:20 PM / Editor / permalink    0 comments  




Center for American Progress

It's time I remind you of one of the best and newest centers for liberal thinkers to gather daily, a blog, kind of, called The Progress Report, which is brought to you by the smart and good folks at the Center for American Progress.
O'NEILL

Bush: O'Neill 'Refreshingly Candid'


In response to O'Neill's interview on 60 Minutes, the Bush Administration is launching an investigation, claiming the former Treasury Secretary showed a classified document on screen. The problem for the White House is that, according to the WSJ, the document in question was not a Pentagon document, but a Commerce Department document that was part of Vice President Cheney's secret energy task force – not a war-planning memo. In fact, as Slate notes, the document "has long been available on the website" of Judicial Watch, the conservative group who sued to open up Cheney's task force. (See Daily Talking Points from American Progress for more analysis.)"

SUDDENLY THERE IS URGENCY: While it took the White House just 24 hours to launch an investigation into O'Neill, it took them months to launch an inquiry into the leak of a CIA agent's name. As blogger Josh Marshall notes, "Number of days between Novak column outing Valerie Plame and announcement of investigation: 74 days. Number of days between O'Neill 60 Minutes interview and announcement of investigation: 1 day. Having the administration reveal itself as a gaggle of hypocritical goons ... priceless."

NOT HELD TO SAME STANDARD: While the White House fulminates over its O'Neill investigation, there has never been an investigation into scores of classified leaks by the White House to Bob Woodward for his book "Bush At War." As Woodward acknowledges, he was given access to "notes taken during more than 50 National Security Council and other meetings" (which are classified) while also receiving "personal notes, memos, calendars, written internal chronologies, transcripts and other documents." The Providence Journal reported on 4/10/02 that Woodward said the President himself "often spoke candidly about classified information."

STILL AN HONEST MAN: While the right-wing attack machine targets former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill, one thing has been made very clear by President Bush and Vice President Cheney: O'Neill is an honest man. In nominating O'Neill, Bush said "in a distinguished career, Paul has earned a reputation as a straight shooter." When administering the Oath of Office, Cheney said, "Secretary O'Neill is a man of consistently sound judgment. He's a man of honor and decency who will make all Americans proud." After O'Neill commented about the growing size of the deficit in 2002, President Bush again said, "I find Paul O'Neill to be refreshingly candid. I appreciate his judgment." Even as O'Neill was leaving the White House, Bush said "Paul [is] one of the most fine, honorable, decent men I've ever served with. He can be proud for all he has done for his country." Maybe this is why so few conservatives are attacking what O'Neill actually had to say, and instead have resorted to attacking O'Neill personally.

A HISTORY OF INTIMIDATION: This is not the first time the White House has sought to punish those who tell the truth. As an American Progress backgrounder shows the White House summarily fired top economic adviser Larry Lindsey "when he told a newspaper that an Iraq war could cost $200 billion." Similarly, Mideast envoy Gen. Anthony Zinni was fired after he admitted post-war Iraq could be difficult. Gen. Eric Shinseki was criticized by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld when he admitted the army would need "several hundred thousand troops" to do the job in Iraq.

BOOK EXCERPTS: The WSJ has posted excerpts from Ron Suskind's book about O'Neill. Simon and Schuster is expected to post the entire first chapter on its website.
Center for American Progress
 


8:06 PM / Editor / permalink    0 comments