CHINA, POLITICS: Life in Tibet, A Rebuttal
By Shi Rui
I avoided mentioning the Tibetan’s life deliberately in the essay on my trip to Tibet, because it’s too complex to describe and analyze in a travel article. Some people think the Tibetans are quite satisfied with their former life and don’t like the change the PRC government forced on them. It’s partly true, but not exactly.
After the liberation, apart from the more convenient and modern life, the Tibetans obtained the rights and opportunities to have a better education, to know more about other parts of the world, and to take the reins of their own life. People in Tibet can be divided into three kinds: city dwellers, town dwellers and the nomadic people. The Tibetans that live in cities are gradually getting used to modern life, and are becoming more and more dependent on the comforts that the new life brings them.
Take Lhasa for example: shopping centers, hotels, and restaurants can be seen everywhere. Many Tibetans wear the same kind of clothes as the Han, giving up their heavy, complicated traditional dress. No one forces them to change their clothes; they do it willingly, and I don’t consider it a betrayal of their race or religion. Why? The modern textile industry has developed so rapidly that much softer, lighter, and warmer fabrics flood into every corner of the world.
I don’t mean that forgetting the old traditions is good. Of course, Tibetan’s special clothes are a kind of culture, but it’s too old to be dominant nowadays. It is more suitable to be viewed and admired. When festivals come, or great events happen, all of the Tibetan people will put on their traditional dresses, which I think is enough.
I stayed in Lhasa for 3 days and then left. I traveled east by jeep with my father, planning to drive all the way straight to Sichuan province. We stopped on the way frequently for different purposes: having lunch, looking for water, taking photos, picking flowers, and talking to the local people. We stayed at the small taverns in the towns for the night and observed the people’s life. Things were quite different in towns than in the city. We could always see pigs and chickens walking on the main street. The pace of life was obviously slower. People in those towns lead the life the Tibetans in Lhasa led decades ago.
I was told by our provisional driver, a Tibetan man, that in the past a man’s life was very easy in the small towns. Women did all the housework, planting and grazing. The men just drank wines, horsed around, got together to sing, dance and chat in the sun. Some of the men would leave home for traveling in spring, carrying all the money of the family with them, and come back at the end of the autumn penniless. They did not share the responsibility of raising the family. Their wives and daughters took care of everything.
That is why when I mentioned the Tibetan country scene I referred to the “beautiful shepherdess.” On the one hand, they were too busy to go to school; on the other hand they had very few schools and teachers. Nowadays children in the cities and towns can have a better education, and some of them get the opportunity to come to Beijing or Shanghai for further study. I went to Tibet on a summer vacation and accidentally saw posters pasted on the wall in a town, reading: “the following students are accepted by the first-class universities.” And then there was a name list and the marks they got in the college entrance examination.
There is a Tibetan girl who majors in English in my department here at Beijing Foreign Studies University. She came here from Lhasa in the year 2003 and now is in her sophomore year. She is not different from us except that she can run much faster and won the 800-meter race last semester in the school sports meeting. What’s more, there are 5 Tibetan students in my mother’s class (my mother teaches English in another college in Hubei province). They work very hard and diligently because they cherish the chance.
My Tibetan guide told me that all of the high school students in Tibet learn mandarin and English together with their Tibetan language. Most of them accept the course arrangement and consider the language learning necessary and useful.
About the clothing issue, I noticed that almost all the people in towns and small villages wore the same clothes as Han. It was amazing. When I was in Lhasa, of course, I saw Tibetans dressing like us but the percentage was not as large as in the towns. People in traditional Tibetan dress could still be seen everywhere. An engineer explained the phenomenon to me several days later. He said the Tibetans in Lhasa are of two kinds: local inhabitants and pilgrims.
Many of the local inhabitants work in the travel service field since Lhasa is the inescapable center of everyone’s trip to Tibet. All people serving the travelers are required to wear their traditional dress and all of the pilgrims must wear the same unquestionably. That’s why we saw lots of Tibetan dresses in Lhasa but not even one in the other places.
We did meet some Tibetans who were fiercely against the PRC government. They thought we were invaders and that we destroyed their life, their culture, their great religion and their freedom. It’s hard for me to say. Maybe they are right. Maybe they really prefer their former life, the difficult, harsh, but to some extent spiritually rich life.
Generally speaking, the objectors are devotional believers of Buddhism who regard the Dalai Lama as their only master. Many of them will go to Lhasa on foot however far away they live, and make their pilgrimage to the Buddha in the Potala Palace. The journey was once so long and dangerous that one might never return home.
No matter how much these believers hate the changes our government has brought about, at least now they can go on pilgrimages more easily, more quickly and more safely on the national highway built and maintained by the PLA.
I avoided mentioning the Tibetan’s life deliberately in the essay on my trip to Tibet, because it’s too complex to describe and analyze in a travel article. Some people think the Tibetans are quite satisfied with their former life and don’t like the change the PRC government forced on them. It’s partly true, but not exactly.
After the liberation, apart from the more convenient and modern life, the Tibetans obtained the rights and opportunities to have a better education, to know more about other parts of the world, and to take the reins of their own life. People in Tibet can be divided into three kinds: city dwellers, town dwellers and the nomadic people. The Tibetans that live in cities are gradually getting used to modern life, and are becoming more and more dependent on the comforts that the new life brings them.
Take Lhasa for example: shopping centers, hotels, and restaurants can be seen everywhere. Many Tibetans wear the same kind of clothes as the Han, giving up their heavy, complicated traditional dress. No one forces them to change their clothes; they do it willingly, and I don’t consider it a betrayal of their race or religion. Why? The modern textile industry has developed so rapidly that much softer, lighter, and warmer fabrics flood into every corner of the world.
I don’t mean that forgetting the old traditions is good. Of course, Tibetan’s special clothes are a kind of culture, but it’s too old to be dominant nowadays. It is more suitable to be viewed and admired. When festivals come, or great events happen, all of the Tibetan people will put on their traditional dresses, which I think is enough.
I stayed in Lhasa for 3 days and then left. I traveled east by jeep with my father, planning to drive all the way straight to Sichuan province. We stopped on the way frequently for different purposes: having lunch, looking for water, taking photos, picking flowers, and talking to the local people. We stayed at the small taverns in the towns for the night and observed the people’s life. Things were quite different in towns than in the city. We could always see pigs and chickens walking on the main street. The pace of life was obviously slower. People in those towns lead the life the Tibetans in Lhasa led decades ago.
I was told by our provisional driver, a Tibetan man, that in the past a man’s life was very easy in the small towns. Women did all the housework, planting and grazing. The men just drank wines, horsed around, got together to sing, dance and chat in the sun. Some of the men would leave home for traveling in spring, carrying all the money of the family with them, and come back at the end of the autumn penniless. They did not share the responsibility of raising the family. Their wives and daughters took care of everything.
That is why when I mentioned the Tibetan country scene I referred to the “beautiful shepherdess.” On the one hand, they were too busy to go to school; on the other hand they had very few schools and teachers. Nowadays children in the cities and towns can have a better education, and some of them get the opportunity to come to Beijing or Shanghai for further study. I went to Tibet on a summer vacation and accidentally saw posters pasted on the wall in a town, reading: “the following students are accepted by the first-class universities.” And then there was a name list and the marks they got in the college entrance examination.
There is a Tibetan girl who majors in English in my department here at Beijing Foreign Studies University. She came here from Lhasa in the year 2003 and now is in her sophomore year. She is not different from us except that she can run much faster and won the 800-meter race last semester in the school sports meeting. What’s more, there are 5 Tibetan students in my mother’s class (my mother teaches English in another college in Hubei province). They work very hard and diligently because they cherish the chance.
My Tibetan guide told me that all of the high school students in Tibet learn mandarin and English together with their Tibetan language. Most of them accept the course arrangement and consider the language learning necessary and useful.
About the clothing issue, I noticed that almost all the people in towns and small villages wore the same clothes as Han. It was amazing. When I was in Lhasa, of course, I saw Tibetans dressing like us but the percentage was not as large as in the towns. People in traditional Tibetan dress could still be seen everywhere. An engineer explained the phenomenon to me several days later. He said the Tibetans in Lhasa are of two kinds: local inhabitants and pilgrims.
Many of the local inhabitants work in the travel service field since Lhasa is the inescapable center of everyone’s trip to Tibet. All people serving the travelers are required to wear their traditional dress and all of the pilgrims must wear the same unquestionably. That’s why we saw lots of Tibetan dresses in Lhasa but not even one in the other places.
We did meet some Tibetans who were fiercely against the PRC government. They thought we were invaders and that we destroyed their life, their culture, their great religion and their freedom. It’s hard for me to say. Maybe they are right. Maybe they really prefer their former life, the difficult, harsh, but to some extent spiritually rich life.
Generally speaking, the objectors are devotional believers of Buddhism who regard the Dalai Lama as their only master. Many of them will go to Lhasa on foot however far away they live, and make their pilgrimage to the Buddha in the Potala Palace. The journey was once so long and dangerous that one might never return home.
No matter how much these believers hate the changes our government has brought about, at least now they can go on pilgrimages more easily, more quickly and more safely on the national highway built and maintained by the PLA.

6 Comments:
At 8:07 PM , Anonymous said...
Clothing! Who mentioned the clothing in the previous comments???! Haha. Really funny Shi Rui. I didn't know that Tibetians were pissed off because of the fashion invasion. "They dress just the Han." The Han dress just like westerners.
At 4:52 PM , Anonymous said...
I like your rebuttal better than your article, Shi Rui. You avoided all the purple prose and spoke more about the interaction between Tibetans and Han, as opposed to simply staring at them.
But there's a few things that still confuse/bother me:
1) First you say "No one forces them to change their clothes; they do it willingly, and I don’t consider it a betrayal of their race or religion", but then you say "All people serving the travelers are required to wear their traditional dress". Pilgrims have to wear the dress for pilgrimmage, ok. In fact, I believe that is the original purpose of the costume. So who exactly "requires" Tibetans in the tourism industry to wear the outfit? And why is it when I visit the Forbidden City in Beijing none of the Han working there are "required" to wear traditional Chinese costumes? Why is there so much emphasis in minorities getting dressed up like they live in the past, if that's not what they normally wear, yet I've never seen Han tour guides do that?
2) You say Tibetans, after the liberation, "obtained the rights and opportunities... to take the reins of their own life". What does that mean, exactly? They've gained control over what that they did not control before?
3) You say "Tibetan’s special clothes are a kind of culture, but it’s too old to be dominant nowadays"... As in modern clothes are lighter and warmer, right? OK, but are you sure they always wore the special clothes everyday? It was my impression those clothes have long been only for special occasions. Wouldn't make much sense to wear your best dress everyday while shepherding. That would mean it was never "dominant", except in the tourism industry. If the costume was never everyday clothing, then your implication that it has lost purpose is wrong.
4) I'm glad to hear you spoke to some people, even if I'm a bit skeptical that in the past, men always sat around drinking and chatting. You also say that during that same time period, the Tibetan life was "difficult, harsh". Drinking and chatting "in the sun" doesn't sound like a brutal life. And in the previous post, you describe the "beautiful shepherdess", whom you suggest here is emblematic of that same past (before they started wearing modern clothes, before the liberation), as "expression of satisfaction on her face suggested a healthy life and contentment", so the traditional life must not have been so bad for girls either. So which is it: was the traditional life "difficult, harsh" or was it "easy and clean, just like the blue sky"? You can't have both!
5) So you do know a Tibetan student at BFSU. You say "She is not different from us except that she can run much faster and won the 800-meter race last semester in the school sports meeting." So she's the same as you? Have you tried asking her what it's like being Tibetan in the Han capital? Do you think maybe it's difficult for her? Maybe she experiences things as a Tibetan in Beijing that you don't know about. Ever spoken to a Han Chinese who studied abroad and got culture shock, didn't like the food, had a few people treat them badly and make them very upset? Or maybe she has her own opinion about the changes in Tibet the past few decades? Or maybe she's a singer in a rock band? Why don't you try asking her who she is? Again, I'd like to see an interview - as in the actual words that come out of people's mouths, not paraphrasing. I'm not saying they'll disagree or agree with you - I'm saying I'd be interested to hear many different views more directly.
6) You seem unsure why some Tibetans might be unhappy with the PRC's changes in Tibet. Sure, it might be because they prefer their "difficult, harsh" life. Maybe it's just a religious thing. But did you ever consider that maybe they don't like somebody different from them coming to their towns and villages and imposing or coaxing change? I know the PRC and many Han sometimes get uncomfortable when they feel a foreigner is telling them what to do or what is best... everybody in the world has experienced that feeling, even Americans! I think that's a feeling anybody can sympathize with, no one likes the feeling that they're being condescended to. Maybe they just want to be left alone so they can "take the reins of their own life."
Happy New Year, and good luck with exams.
At 10:08 PM , Shi Rui said...
Thank you for reading, and the following are my answers to your questions.
1) a. “Who exactly "requires" Tibetans in the tourism industry to wear the outfit?”
Of course, the answer is the boss. Their boss requires them to dress so. And the boss is not necessarily a Han. There are also local travel agencies, and local businessmen. It’s only a thing related to commercial purpose, not a prejudice or an injustice treatment to the minorities.
b. “Why is it when I visit the Forbidden City in Beijing none of the Han working there are "required" to wear traditional Chinese costumes?”
I’m really happy that you have been here before. How do you like it?
To answer this question, I want to say, every minority has its own traditional costume, and you can still see them occasionally. But Han doesn’t have one. We have no traditional costume. I think you mixed the traditional costume up with the ancient dress. They are not the same.
2) a, “What does that mean, exactly?”
I mean: with the new technology brought in from the modern world and the communication with the outside society, there are now more life styles they can choose from.
b, “They've gained control over what that they did not control before?”
To some extent, they've gained control over their fate. Suppose you are a Tibetan in 1900, and you don’t want to be a shepherd for your whole life, then how large the chance was for you to change your future? I didn’t mean it’s impossible for them to make a change, but, obviously, much more opportunities can be applied today.
3) “Are you sure they always wore the special clothes everyday?”
Yes I am sure. They were not the special clothes, before liberation. They were everyday clothes. And when the festival came, they put on fancier ones, which were as long and heavy as the common ones, and they would also wore more ornaments.
4)a, “Drinking and chatting "in the sun" doesn't sound like a brutal life.”
Firstly, the happiness of men cannot stand for the happiness of all the Tibetans. Have you ever considered the women and the children? How difficult the life could be to them?
Secondly, “life was difficult and harsh” means compared with these days, it was more difficult for them to survive in the nature in the past. They had no electricity, no running water, no medical practitioners and equipments for example. But, they have no conflict with the spiritually happy life. The life that Tibetans lived 70 years ago is like the life we live 700 years ago. Could it be possible that some of our ancestors just drank and chatted every day although he might die the next day because of appendicitis?
b, “So which is it: was the traditional life ‘difficult, harsh’ or was it ‘easy and clean, just like the blue sky’? ”
When I mentioned the shepherdess I said,” Some sheep began to move towards me. A Tibetan girl accompanied them. …and the expression of satisfaction on her face suggested a healthy life and contentment.” I described as a part of the picture in front of my eyes, to show how beautiful the scene was. She was an individual, standing for nothing. Her satisfaction didn’t represent that every one was satisfied. She was still a girl and knew little about the illness, death that the “harsh” life may brought to her and her family. The sunset was announcing the end of her whole-day work, and she had all her sheep around her, with no one lost. Was that enough for a young girl to feel satisfied, and happy? About the healthy life, I referred to the regular life, and the life far away from the pollution.
5) Thank you for your suggestion, and I’ve taken it. I called the girl today, and fixed a time for a face-to-face interview. As you know, our final exam is approaching and both she and I are busy, so it won’t be done till we finish the exam. Please wait for several days. I’ll put the interview on WOW after the exam.
6) Yes, I am unsure about the reason of their hatred. Maybe what you suggested here is right, or maybe there are some other reasons. Well, I don’t know and I don’t want to make a guess. I’ll ask my interviewee and also try to ask some other Tibetans later.
I’m sorry because sometimes I failed to express myself well and cause the misunderstanding.
Hope you like my reply.
BTW Happy new year!
At 12:00 AM , Anonymous said...
I must say you have done quite a good job. Congratulations and just get on!
You should not be bothered to take the posts above seriously. These people still think they are the race who sets the standards and keep fooling around. To the points they posted here even I can easily give an answer.
1) Everyone reads your article sensibly is clear that you mean there is no general imposition of clothing codes.
2) Before 1949, Tibet was serfdom system. Even the bulk of the free peasants had a problem of continuous existence struggle. These people did not attack the Dalai Lama because they were then busy with oppressing their own colonies and making profits. Now the Dalai Lama promises democracy and human right because he lives on the western donators whose money has originally come from the abuse of former colonies like China and India.
3) You have mentioned that the dressing codes is not general and the most Tibetans do not live on tourism.
4) The Tibetans’ life was harsh does not equal tibetan men’s life was harsh. Even from their own experience/practice the westerners should know these are vigorously different.
5) The fact is she won the race. Tibetans’ life in the capital could be as hard as a Shanghainese or Cantonese in the same city. The poster wants to impose a view that Tibetans are foreigners and Tibet is an independent country.
6) Every country’s territory and boundary has its own history and reason. The so-called de facto independence of Tibet was quite problematic because the Dalai Lama administration neither fill the category of “clear defined territory” and “continuous administration”. The area under the Dalai Lama control have never stood up with what he claims to be Tibet and the boundaris shifted several times and had not been settled until 1960s. Even so, a bunch of international prominent lawyers can write a lengthy book why Tibet was/is/should be independent, ignoring all the facts. Ironically, before 1949 the major international forces to hold Tibet under Chinese sovereign have been the U.S. and Britain. But then China was a private trophy of (first) Britain/(then) the U.S. and after 1949 the situation has changed. Who benefits from the Tibetans/Han conflict? Tibetans? No. The independence is unrealistic; the most Tibetans just use the Han as escapegoat for the problems of their own. Han? No. The international pressure costs the Han a lot of fund, energy and attention. Only the traditional powers like the U.S. and the E.U. can benefit enormously at a minimal cost. The Tibet Issue always serve as their leverage to press China for their own interests/agendas. An independent Tibet can resolve the problem. No. The Tibetans will lose all their actual benefits; the territory issue will extend to Qinghai, Sichuan, Yunnan, Gansu where Tibetans are mingled with other people; many landlocked ethnical groups will stand now on the immediate boundary and get a hope of struggling for their own independence; the problem for the Han will be endless. The debates about Tibet issue are not based on the actual interest/prospect of the Tibetans/Han but on the pure emotion. Every multicutural society has its own problems of integration/division. There are tens of thousands of ethnicities around the globe and it is not always possible for everyone to gain a statehood. There will always grudges against each other, based on misunderstandings/present or historical conflicts. You should abandon the illusion that, if no such conflicts/disputes, every person thousand kilometers away will readily accept you as the member of their community. Even your immediate neighbour won’t do that. Regarding the foreign invaders, a lot of Europeans and Americans have come and gone in the former colonial China. Have any responsible countries said sorry or repaired the damages? No. Even today, the westerners who visit former colonies like Shanghai, Qingdao, Dalian, Guangzhou, Hong Kong, feel absolutely good, no bit sorry. A lot of westerners even insist that Hong Kong should have remained under the British rule. Their point: the Hong Kong people will. They has it right. For Jesus’s sake, the British have acted quitely undemocrtically on this issue.
What more import I found in your page is that the Chinese people are becoming conscious of these topics and are taking a reasonable approach to them. This is ABSOLUTELY NECESSARRY. For the westerners, the Tibet Issue is just a fascination/hobby/sport. They have abundant energy/fund and no responsibility, won’t be harmed by the consequences. For you, it is the fate of tens of millions of YOUR people! I am really afraid some fools here will dishearten you.
At 4:35 AM , Anonymous said...
Hey, I'm the one who posted the 6 questions.
First, thanks for the reply Shi Rui, and I'm happy to hear you're pursuing an interview.
To the previous poster, I'd like to respond:
1) I did not ask about the clothes to suggest there is some oppressive law or other mechanism forcing Tibetans to wear traditional dress. Shi Rui got most of what I was hinting at when he said it's the boss who decides and that the boss isn't neccessarily Han. I was think more along the lines that they dress that way, and the boss says so, because there is an expectation by tourists. They want to see Tibetans in traditional clothing, because that's what they came for. This happens with minority tourism everywhere - check out this post at ESWN about how Americans do it to South American Indians. The problem is that sometimes tourists from outside impose an idea of who they are visiting is supposed to be. Western tourists do the same thing coming to China when they expect to find all Chinese people wear mao jackets and ride bicycles. In fact, there have been western writers lamenting about the gradual disappearance of the bicycle in Chinese cities, because they thought that had something to do with being Chinese. This can be harmful because it can distort who the people you are visiting really are.
2) I find Shi Rui's answer to this question pretty sound. While the previous poster seems to think I'm suggesting a certain political view, he clearly used this question to wax rhapsodic about his own political view.
3) On this question, I genuinely wasn't sure if traditional Tibetan dress was for everyday stuff or only special occasions. Thanks to Shi Rui for making that clear.
4) I knew that you only meant the guys got to drink and chat. I interpreted your shepherd girl comments, about the "satisfaction" on her face, as basically saying the shepherding life was pretty good for her too, and she's young and female, which means everybody is accounted for. But I remind you of your first post; you really painted a picture that the rural shepherding life was wonderful - so what you mention now, about medical care, running water, etc. is absolutely valid, but stands in stark contrast to the first article you wrote. My comments in the aspect really center around your writing, not whether or not these things or true or to suggest some dark sinister motive. It's simply that I have trouble from your articles reconciling these two images - one of tranquil life in harmony with nature, the other a brutal and harsh life without light bulbs. I find the second one more realistic, and therefore better written.
5) This is where I'm offended by the previous poster. I don't make any suggestion whatsoever that the girl in question is from another country - I simply suggest she is from a different culture. I don't think any of us is going to argue that Tibetan culture and Han culture are identical, or that life in Tibet and life in Beijing are identical. So the previous poster seems, once again, to imagine a political view from my side and put words in my mouth so that he can express his opposition. My point of the article is that she's from a different place - not a different country. I'd be just as interested to see an article about a student at the school from anywhere in China, whether Han or not, talking about the difficulties of adjusting to a new place. University is a time of great personal change and obstacles, and if they come from a small Han village in Fujian or a Korean autonomous region in Heilongjiang I'd ask the same questions.
6) For the sixth point, it's a simple fact that people anywhere resent when they feel another bunch of people are coming into their homes and telling them how to change their lives. Territorial claims and all that aren't necessary, though in the case of Tibet that argument is made. It doesn't have to involve claims of independence or any of that - just look at the history of New York City. One generation you'd get alot of immigrants from Ireland, and all the "natives" (who immigrated the previous generation) would hate the Irish. Next generation, the Italians come and then the Irish feel the Italians coming in and mucking up "their" city. Half the world feels irritated when a McDonald's is put in their town, because they feel American values are invading. The French got so upset about McDonald's a farmer bulldozed one. So the resentment in Tibet, even if the whole independence movement didn't exist, would still be there because of all the Han migration there simply because some Tibetans would find it to be a threat to the way things were before, and they don't want change (good or bad).
Just to clarify on the independence issue, I actually agree with the previous poster that independence is unrealistic and a bad idea. It's just not feasible and I think all parties involved should sit down and compromise as to how they're going to improve things together, which would require accomodation from both sides. If I had a burning desire to advocate for Tibetan independence, I would've said it. I suggest the previous poster not resort to propping me up as a straw man, and try to avoid name calling when he does.
At 8:07 PM , Anonymous said...
Joseph, thank you for speak out.
Did you ask why Tibetan language is banned as language of instruction in Lhasa University?
Post a Comment
<< Home