8.14.2006

NATIONAL NEWS: Hunting Restrictions Reorganized With Regulated Quotas and Opened to Foreign Hunters

By Shi Rui

The Chinese government auctioned quotas for wild animal hunting for the first time to four mainland agencies on August 13 in Chengdu city, the capital of Sichuan province.

There were hunting quotas for 289 wild animals of 14 species in the auction, all of them herbivores. Takin is the only species of the first category of national wildlife protection while all the other 13 kinds are of the second category.

The base price of the auction is the quarry price set by the government in 1996, such as: $10,500 for a blue sheep, $22,000 for an argali, and $28,000 for a takin, etc.

According to Wang Wei, vice director of the Wildlife and Plant Conservation Division of the State Forestry Administration, the professional hunting could not destroy wild animal populations with the strict limitations in number, time and place. He also mentions that the hunting is restricted to eight areas, including Ningxia, Qinghai, Shanxi, Gansu, Xinjiang, Hunan, Sichuan and Inner Mongolia.

The government started to allow foreigners to hunt wildlife with payment from 1985 in Qinghai province. The action was considered an effective way to collect funds for animal protection and stimulate local people's awareness that wildlife is precious.

"Most of the wild animals killed each year were cooked and eaten by local people. But when they knew a living blue sheep could be sold to international hunters for more than $10,000 in 1985, they stopped hunting it." Wang Wei says, "The profit went back to the local government to rebuild the pasture and to improve the residents' condition of medical treatment."

Every year before 2006, the government would investigate the population and habitat situation of certain species and calculate the hunting quotas. The quotas were then allocated to several domestic agencies, which are qualified to do the international hunting business, and the agencies could sell them to foreign hunters.

The old policy always put forestry officials into a corner when agencies competed for the limited quotas, or when higher officials pressed them to give preference or priority to any certain agency.

"This year's auction mitigates our pressure, because it is open, and therefore fair. It allows no wire-pulling." Wang Wei says, "The quotas go to those offering the highest prices, and personal relationships will be of no use."

The bidders were restricted to only four qualified domestic agencies, including China Wildlife Conservation Association and three other travel agencies, but foreign agencies and even individuals will have a chance to bid in the auction next year.

This article by Ms. Shi Rui was first published in the South China Morning Post -- the editors

22 Comments:

  • At 11:55 AM , Anonymous said...

    some comments:

    to use 'etc' in an article - wrong. hope the 'professor' has not been teaching that one (actually is a common habit among inexperienced chinese writers writing in english)

    the story - amazed at how much the writer took this subject at face value, with no critical edge at all. even more amazed when one considers the huge uproar that this topic has caused among the chinese online community. and still no update?

    also, try to ease up on the use of 'foreigners' as a collective noun. "foreign hunters' would be better than just 'foreigners'. also, try 'overseas' once in a while.

    finally, it may be a good idea to have a link to the printed version. I know the standards of scmp have slipped massively of late, but i just can't imagine they woulf print even 50 percent of this article in its present form.

     
  • At 12:27 PM , freda said...

    Some old people say that learning through trial and error is an effective way. None of us have ever claimed that we could do the best from the very beginning. As what you have said, we are indeed inexperienced Chinese writers writing in English, and nobody is ashamed of this, for we keep trying and learning, and I beleive we are making progress.

    Thank you for pointing out our shortcomings in Enlgish writing, though there seems to be need in showing off how well one knows about his or her mother tongue.

    Moreover, I can't comment on how you find about SCMP. The only thing I can say is that pls don't judge the standard of this newspaper simply from the works of two interns. It has many excellent correspondents, which I believe you know better than I do.

    After all, we came to SCMP to learn, not to represent its standard.

    One more thing. Seems you are not satisfied with our professor, is that so? If you are, pls don't carry personal feelings in talking about what you regarded as professional matters. If you are not, do forgive me for my poor English comprehension.

    Anyway, thank you for providing criticism. No matter it's out of goodwills or not, beginner journalists like us can learn some thing.

     
  • At 12:33 PM , Shi Rui said...

    Thanks for your instructions.

    Our professor is not an English teacher in the high school, so it is not his fault if I fail to write in a native way.

    My English, as well as other journalism skills, needs great improvement, and that's why I'm working as an intern now.
    I am learning.

    The story was a daily one. I returned to my office from the presser at 6:40 p.m. and the dealine was 8:30. So pls forgive me for not finding some other sources to comment or criticise on the issue.

    About the update...Sorry I do not attend the second presser held by the officials so I didn't write anything. Yes of course I can translate some comments and reports on other mainland's newspaper, but that will be more "unprofessional", "unethical" or even "illegal" as some comments said these days.

    Thank you again for your help.

     
  • At 2:34 PM , Joseph said...

    Anonymous,

    That's it! For the first time in the two-year history of WOW, I am stepping in publicly in my role as faculty supervisor. While our reporters and editors will indeed address your "criticisms" fully and openly in a post for all to read, as of this moment, unless you identify yourself as the so-called professional journalist you claim to be, all of your future "criticisms" will be deleted. If you are indeed a journalist, and state your name, you know that I will recognize who you are and your real purpose will be exposed. It has become quite clear to me that your problem is not with WOW and its reporters but with me, the 'professor' (I believe is how you nastily put it) Joseph Bosco, American author and journalist.

    You know very well that the post calling you a "cretin" was from a reader of WOW, who identified himself, and not from anyone connected with WOW. And he took you to the intellectual woodshed for the spanking you so thoroughly deserve for loosely throwing around the harshest accusations--libelous accusations--in the business: plagiary and the theft of intellectual property without so much as a smidgen of basic research. That is as unprofessional as it gets and proves that you have a hidden agenda and an axe to grind with me.

    Consequently, you will no longer abuse these students until and unless you identify yourself. They have the courage to put their names not only on their articles but also on their quite reserved--in my opinion--answers to your mean-spirited, racist, anti-China comments.

    If you want to take me on, journalist to journalist, then do so. But take it to The LongBow Papers, and identify yourself. I will put up a post to welcome you. There is a link to it handily available.

    By the way, WOW--as I have stated emphatically--is not a "blog" in its typical definition! We used the Blogger format because it was a fast, easy and inexpensive way to get an online news magazine up and running upon which students could gain publishing experience.

    Regards,

    Joseph Bosco

     
  • At 3:14 PM , Anonymous said...

    wow (in the original sense) talk about an over-reaction.

    'Professor' Bosco - I am not who you think I am, so you just wasted some very angry words on the wrong person. I am not a journalist, just a reader. The only reason I highlight the word 'Professor' is because, well, you know why.

    The writers: this was not meant to be a personal attack and I apologise if it appears so. Yes, you are interns, but are you also journalism students and I would expect that your teachers could help you know and again in adressing some basic errors. In fact, from my experience of Chinese writers in English, you write very well and should be very proud of your achievement. I still feel the author could have done more with this story than just repeat the standard ministry press release and, as I said, in the light of developments, an update would be interesting. After all, an online news magazine is what this is all about.

    As for SCMP, it has gone way downhill in recent years and I hope you use it as a stepping stone to greater careers. However, my point was that this article looked in need of editing and I wondered what the final SCMP version looked like. And Mr. Bosco, maybe you could help your students by taking a bigger role in the editing process. If you did, there would be less pedantic contributions from people like me, and you would produce even better journalists.

     
  • At 4:13 PM , Anonymous said...

    ps. want to point out where anything I wrote could be interpreted: "mean-spirited, racist, anti-China comments"?

    racism is a word you should not throw around lightly, so stop it.

    mr bosco, it seems from your over-reaction and your anti-free speeech platitudes that you are slowly slipping away from the political ideology that your biography suggests you once had. what a shame.

     
  • At 7:20 PM , Anonymous said...

    once again, no it was not me. the only reason I sign is as anonymous is that it is so hard to log in and register. blame the media, not the message. all comments by anonymous on here are from myself.

    and yes, i do have a bee in my sizable bonnet about foreigners in china trading under false titles such as professor. last week I met a EFL teacher from Tsinghua, who is also a professor at an 'elite' university. he doesn't even have a masters. if you are so non-academic, then just stop using the title they gave you.

    I actually think the standard of writing on here is high, but in need of a good editor. that was the initial point of my first comment. call it public service.

    however, you should tell your fragile students who are lacking self confidence that it will only get worse. if they choose to make their words public, they can expect to be shot down on occassion. From reading your last post, i would think your students were all at middle school, not university. In need of protecting? No they are in need of exposure to the harsh realities of life. pain in their hearts? For pete's sake, the first thing you should have taught them is that is they want to be precious about thier words, go try and be a novelist and leave journalism for those who are open to criticism and comment. If they don't like criticism, they should stop wanting to be journalists right this moment. Really.

     
  • At 9:02 PM , the Admiral said...

    Anonymous#2,

    If in fact, you are a different person, let me pose a question to you.

    Why is it that you feel you are qualified to critique these young journalist?

    You said, and I quote "to use 'etc' in an article - wrong. hope the 'professor' has not been teaching that one"

    Why is this unacceptable?
    Who are you to say so?
    Perhaps you have some credentials?
    Perhaps you are a "professor"?
    Perhaps you think your English writing skills are more advanced than the young Ms. Shi Rui?

    Well... Think about it anony-mouse#2.

    Why is it that Ms. Shi Rui was wrong for using 'etc' in an article?

    Since you are such an expert, would you care to critique the following newspaper article?

    ...There has always been much hand-wringing over what you were supposed to call people like us -- refugees, evacuees, etc. -- but the terminology I prefer is that my kids were "embedded" at their grandparents' house...

    Did you see the 'etc' Anonymous#2?

    In order to save you face, let me tell you where the article is from, before you level your "grammar gun" sights on the use of 'etc'.

    The article, "The family's back: Where adults see darkness, the kids see cool" was written by Chris Rose, and won the Pulitzer Prize in 2006.

    Perhaps, anonymous#2, you have heard of the Pulitzer Prize?
    Perhaps, anonymous#2, you would like to post on Chris Rose's blog that "to use 'etc' in an artile - wrong."?

    Perhaps, anonymous#2, you would like the Pulitzer Prize revoked from Chris Rose, for using 'etc' in an article.

    Perhaps, anonymous#2, you should email the Pulitzer Prize committee and rebuke them for their error as nonchalantly as you did Ms. Shi Rui. I am sure your opinion will be receive the consideration it is due.

    Anonymous2, if you are a reasonable adult, you must realize you were mistaken in giving this advice to Ms. Shi Rui. I am sure you are willing to make amends.

    I, as a gentleman, eagerly await your apology to Ms. Shi Rui, Dr. Professor Bosco, WOW, SCMP,Darwin, and the human race as a whole;though it is not necessary as I have proved you to be incorrect in this matter.

    Regards,

    Frank F.
    the Admiral

    P.S. Here is the link to the 2006 Pulitzer Prize winning article excerpted above.

    http://www.pulitzer.org/year/2006/public-service/works/neworleansps20.html

    P.P.S. What a waste of opposable thumbs you are. How you have managed the QWERTY layout is beyond me.

     
  • At 10:58 PM , freda said...

    I do want to beg people stop quarrelling.

    Mr. Anonymous, I think there must have been some misunderstanding in the communication. I'm sorry that people here are speaking different languages.

    By "fragile self-confidence", professor Bosco did not mean that we should always be little birds under protection, but that we may need more encouragement in the learning process since we are writing in a second language. The emphasis is on "second language", not anything else. And we are brave, so don't worry about it. We have not only received criticism or critiques from you and the other Mr.anonymous, but have also bared misunderstanding, jeer and even calumniation from contemporary Chinese journalism professions (because they wanted to make sensitive news to attract readers). We know-at least have a slight idea on-that life could be harsh. Don't worry too much on this aspect.

    We are inexperienced because we are young, which, by the way, was not our fault. If you are speaking as a kind elder instructor, I would like to smile at you and guarantee you that followers in the profession are not as fragile as you may have imagined. We will stay in the profession, because we love it.

    No matter what degree professor Bosco has, and no matter he is qualified for the title of professor or not in your eyes, I insist calling him professor Bosco (which I believe my classmates will also do), and the reason is simple: He is a good, caring and instructive professor in his students eyes. That's enough, isn't it?

    Don't be cynical. Life is happy and full of hopes, at least that's how it appears to me. Guess you could have a long comment on this sentence alone. Well, that's your freedom. Just told you what I think, and hope we can share some, or even a little bit, of them.

    To be as polite as possible, I want to say that one does not need to log in or register so as to leave his or her name. I have never registered to this site and do not log in when publishing my comment. Just choosing the identity as "others" and typing in your name will solve the problem.

    Or, in the easiest way, can't we just put it like:
    By freda

    Thanks anyway.

     
  • At 11:36 PM , Shi Rui said...

    Can't agree more.

    yes, freda, we love journalism

    Yes, freda, we are trying our best to be professional, ethical, and illegal.

    yes, freda, we do not copy, plagiarize or simply "rewrite" or "re-edit" stories here.

    yes, freda, we love and respect professor Bosco, who deserves the title completely, but does not deserve the aggression and hostility.
    Professor, don't get angry or depressed when some anonymous considered you not qualified. My classmates and I, your students, are the ones that have the right to judge, Mr./Ms. anonymous is not.

    yes, freda, we are brave. it is not the 1st time we are faced with criticism and harsh reality, but we are still alive, with a firm blief in the existence of beaty and kindness in human nature, as well as in the world.

    we are brave, aren't we? At least we have the courage to put up our names here, which means we are willing to carry the responsibility of every word we wrote here. That's also what journalists should do,I mean, being responsible to your words and works, isn't it?

    OK, thank you all. The concerned anonymous, the curious anonymous, the instructive anonymous and the whatever-you-claim-yourself-to-be anonymous.

     
  • At 11:39 PM , Shi Rui said...

    er...a slip of fingers...

    I mean, we are trying our best to be professional, ethical, and legal.....not illegal....

    forgive me,please....


    T.T

     
  • At 10:01 AM , Anonymous said...

    Yes, you are brave. Why? Because you are Chinese, your blood runs red, red for the nation, red for standing up to the foreigners and their evil influences.

    Anything you do wrong is not your fault, for you are young, and you have been oppressed for centuries.

    So, be sure to stay in the past, believe everything you are told, for you know the truth, it is in your blood, your heritage.

    When people inquire, they are attacking the Great Chinese nation, the Great Chinese people, the Great Chinese. Do not stand for it. Explain away any problems, and ignore shortcomings. Improve only to emigrate.

    You are Chinese. Never, ever forget that.

     
  • At 10:38 AM , freda said...

    Of course we are Chinese, no need to remind

    Of course we love China, no need to put it on the mouth all the time

    Of course we know we should make contributions to our country, no need to imbue

    Of course we'll never forget our nationality, no need to worry

    But being a good journalist, which I guess is the shared aim of everyone here, one thing is to be objective. (No intention to arouse jounarlistic debates, only expressing my own belief)

    I hope me and jouranlists from my generation could work for the benefits of the whole human race. Call me idealistic as you might like, but that's my dream.

    Sir, I never mean to oppose your patriotic words, which I'm couldn't be more happy to agree. But to be frank, I couldn't help seeing some extremeness in it(or ultranationalism..if that's not offensive). Perhaps you are the same age with my father and mother, or elder, or quite unlikely, younger? But that does not matter too much. I do beg you not to call everything into question, including some friendly non-Chinese residents who try their best to help Chinese students and your compatriots who understand very well what patriotism means since they were little kids.

    We should trust each other, and that's another merit of Chinese people, isn't it.

    And we need cooperation within the profession, regardless of nationalities.

     
  • At 11:35 AM , Anonymous said...

    me again, the anonymous of this page only.

    mr bosco - I admire the relationship and mutual support between yourself and your students. very good.

    regarding your biography and your claims to be a fully fledged professor, I am afraid I can only take it with a pinch of salt. Anyone who writes the following with a straight face cannot be taken too seriously: "He has been a frequent guest on DIALOGUE, the premiere current affairs talk show in Asia."

    but this is my last comment on all the matters. I am still surprised that yourself and your students got so excited by some harmless criticisms. (Actually, you more than your students - I wonder why?). But, it is all for the good in the end.

    and Admiral Frank Cheng. No, I won't bother. I have far less interesting things to take up my time.
    bye

     
  • At 2:00 PM , freda said...

    He is not angry with you. And we are not excited because of you.

    Just a difference in belief-sometimes others do not take the things you care about so seriously.

    Thank you for visiting. Hope you are leaving with some understanding.

    Bye.

     
  • At 3:29 PM , Anonymous said...

    Or perhaps they do, which is why they take time to comment.

    And perhaps they simply have a different view, which should be respected.

    And it is difficult to continue conversations when the adviser/professor insists on intemperate language.

    And it is nearly a waste of time when someone who refers to himself as "Admiral" jumps in to attack people. And this is not even his site.

    Simply because people disagree and are concerned does not mean they are not as serious.

     
  • At 5:16 PM , Anonymous said...

    to the last poster

    as i see it, bosco has created a little world inside his university campus, where he is the source of all knowledge on 'western style" journalism. hence the uncontrolable and very badly written streams of anger that emerge when someone dares to think any different to the way he has taught his students to think and work.

    the admiral is much the same, except his blog is even more inane and self-congratulary than bosco's (yes, i know, it doesn't seem possible, but trust me it is).

    they come to china, get treated like emperors by desperate university administrators and then act like emperors through mediums such as blogs or second rate chinese TV shows. and the moment anyone points out that they are wearing no clothes, well, the result is what we see on this page.

    the ones i pity are the students. the low standard of writing shown on these pages and in the longbow papers is a pretty bad example to be setting China's future journalists. A little more maturity would be a much greater influence on the students that all the false boasting that one sees on the 'professor's, ahem, biography page.

    i look forward to the admiral's (snigger) latest response to this. the last one was like being savaged by a lamb. contained all the intellectual power of an 8 year old. "your superior" indeed. I had a good laugh up my sleeve at that one....

    yours for now

     
  • At 7:33 PM , the Admiral said...

    You, anonymous, have proven once and for all that you are an idget.


    Get a job. Get a life. Stop confusing the situation.


    You bore me. You are a bore.

     
  • At 10:48 AM , Anonymous said...

    molested by a squirrel. oooh,it hurts!

     
  • At 3:24 PM , Anonymous said...

    Not by a squirrel--by an Admiral.

    Of a bathtub navy, probably.

    And before you get angry and all, think about how much of this started: by someone concerned about the site-a site which you, Admiral, do not own or edit or manage--and your response was to personally attack the poster, and calling she or he names.

    Then the person who manages the site begins to scream and screech that this concern with journalism is a personal attack aimed at him.

    So now all the gloves are off and nothing has been solved, except that your ego and his are a bit more inflated than usual.

    It could have been different, there might have been an explanation, and a dialogue. But no chance. And that is a damn shame.

     
  • At 9:57 AM , Anonymous said...

    to the last post: exactly

    as the person who got this comment thread going, anything i said original comment was meant to be constructive. the response from the writers was equally reasoned and polite.

    and then...and then came bosco with all his bluster. admittedly, he had his wires crossed and was angry from a previous encounter with another poster. however, this response, and his attacks on the longbow papers, were well out of line.

    but what really got things goinng were the nasty rantings of the self-styled geriatric admiral, who really showed his class and took the discussion to another level. the bitterness dripped through his badly chosen words as he attempted to disguise bad argument with personal attacks. bosco, with friends like admiral, well, you know the rest.

    anyway, hopefully we can lay this to rest now. for my part,I would like to think that bosco is an idealist who has genuinely been seduced by his master's flattery. his blog also shows him to be a hypocrite but then aren't we all?

    admiral though is an entirely different species and his mean contributions to this and other threads say a lot about him, his personality and his worthiness as a human being. the less we hear from him in the future, the better for all.

    good night and good luck (to all the students)

     
  • At 4:10 AM , Anonymous said...

    Hello Help homeless children!
    online [url=http://phentermine.alldating.org/phentermine.htm]phentermine[/url] online
    phentermine
    G'night

     

Post a Comment

<< Home

 
free web counters
New York Hotel Las Vegas


Site Meter