1.30.2006

NATIONAL, BOOK REVIEW: A Review of a Taiwan Masterpiece

by Li Mu

Fairly speaking, it is one of the most celebrated novels written by a most celebrated Chinese writer in Taiwan, but is rarely mentioned in Mainland China except in literary circles and some of the most exclusive circles. The reason is almost natural: it is about gays.

At this point if you are unclear of the writer and his work, I strongly recommend you to skip this piece, since it is as difficult to change ignorance and prejudices as to change sexuality if you happen to regard gays as beasts coveting nasty sex games that brings about AIDS and vile impact on your children and social instability. You will not know how vulnerable love and hope is in the hearts of Crystal Boys (孽子) of Bai Xianyong(or Pai Hsien-yung 白先勇).

According to my opinion, the title of his work, "孽子", should be literally translated as SINFUL SONS. When Chinese see a character like "孽", they see doomed evil, like monstrous floods and droughts, corrupting their flesh and fate. "孽子" are sons born by illegal wives who are not supposed to remain in the family even under the roof of the most benevolent fathers.

The story was written "for those castaway boys wandering alone on the streets of Taipei in the darkest night," setting at the New Park at the beginning of 70s. It was a time when Kuomintang had settled down in Taiwan after it was defeated in 1949 by CPC after three years of civil war. Its soldiers and members, who came from Mainland China, were separated from their homes since.In Taiwan, dominating patriarchal family values centering on the union of man and woman and the bringing-up of male offspring was intolerant of homosexuality, which was generally little known among older generations.

Chrystal boys was adapted into TV series in Taiwan, 2003.

Evasion from family and future

Li Qing was expelled from home by his angry father, because he was discovered to have sexual involvements with a lab administer at his high school. He became settled in New Park, a kingdom of gay boys who had lost homes as he did, where Yang, an experienced adult honored as the master, took care of the boys. The boys hide from the public in the day and lurk under the thick wooded lotus pond at night, discreetly hiding from patrolling police. It was in this kingdom and the voice of Li Qing the lives of these boys were unraveled.

He would have become a distinguished officer, had Li Qing followed the wish of his father, who had a brilliant military career before settling down in a slum in Taiwan. But Li's dream crumbled at the death of his younger brother, whom he shared a life with after his mother eloped from the family at the time he was eight.The memory of his brother haunted him throughout his vagrancy, pushing him to find substitutes he could care as a brother.

Besides a school notice anouncing Li was expelled, no clues were given on when he had became aware of his sexual identity and why he had sexual involvements with the lab administer.Was it because he wished to stray into a erotic life when he did not see a promised future with his brother? Or was it because he had been burdened with unspoken passion for the one he could not bear to lose?

Care, Chases and Clashes

The story of Wang Kuilong (which means A vile dragon in ancient times that brings about tempest and flood) and A Feng (a male phoenix) was told as a legend at New Park. Son of a senior official, Kuilong fell tragically in love with the wild boy grown up in an orphanage. The combine of a vile dragon and a phoenix was doomed with fierce, unyielding combats.

In Feng there is a strange combination of self-denial and self-respect. He deserted himself as a deserted child of the society, "dirty and sick". But in strange self-respect, he defied people trying to help him, disregarding everything given to him. Despite their differences, Kuilong was unyielding in his pursuit, when A Feng kept running away, desperately evading his possession. "I am not born with a heart." A Feng said to Kuilong, who replied:"If you don't have one, I will give mine to you."

One night Kuilong found A Feng ready to go away with an old man. In his madness, he killed A Feng, which caused him to go to court. His furious father, Wang Shangde(in Chinese means "respecting virtue"), banned Kuilong from home till his death. Kuilong strayed in New York "as if with a curse on his back" for ten years before he returned to Taipei, and yet he was not even permitted to attend his father's funeral.

Kuilong, like Li Qing, chases after shadows of the past from substitutes. In his stray in New York, he took care of boys on the street, who reminded him of A Feng, and did not even care when he got hurt.

Reunion and Repentance

Mr. Fu, one of the respected personages secretly helping the boys out. He was a former division commander of Kuomintang, had fought against Japanese invaders during the war. After settling down in Taiwan, he was among the most respected social class and was also a friend of Wang Shangde. Like Li Qing's father, he expected his only son to have a brilliant military career. But his expectation was shattered when he discovered his son had sexual involvements with another soldier. He dictated his extreme disappointment over the phone to His son, whose pride and respect for father led to suicide. Reconciled with the harsh fate, Mr. Fu started to offer his hand to the boys.

Model of the older generation, Mr. Fu cherished old Chinese value of raising a son to continue his career and contribute to the homeland. It was difficult for him to tolerate what was so sharply against mainstream values. The tragic ending of his son is a miniature of the overall tragic split between fathers and rebellious sons: when sons find themselves incompatible to their traditional homes, they either lose it or die.

Unable to meet their own lost ones, Mr. Fu and Wang Kuilong came across the gap to speak to each other as a father and a son, which makes the most dramatic culmination of the novel.

The son, with sad indignation, reproved his father for being so harsh to him: "He hated me so much! Didn't even let me see his face for the one last time! Without leaving a word, he is gone. Isn't he cursing me? He wanted me to go to hell!" The father, with the same indignation, shouted: "It's too unfair of you to talk your father like that! When you are bearing a grudge about your father, have you ever considered how much pain your father had felt? Do you think you can recompense what your father has suffered? Do you think you are the only one bearing the sorrow? You're hurt, but your father is hurt even more." "Then why wouldn't he let me see him for the last time?" "He couldn't bear to see you again, even before he closed his eyes."

Bai Xianyong has said, the novel is about father-son relations and recompense. The father represents Chinese social values and attitudes towards younger generations, and the conflict of father and son represent the conflict of individual and society. As a result of their split from the family, the boys find "pseudo-fathers" and other companions to compensate for what they have lost.

But these castaway boys never found real home in a society that called them as "freaks", and put them to prison and never escape shadows of love and hope.

It is said that the condition of gays at present in Taipei is much better than the 70s. The New Park (which Wang Kuilong considered to be the ugliest park) has been renamed as 228 memorial park in memory of the 228 massacre, and has seen no homeless boys nowadays. Those crystal boys are elsewhere now.

1.29.2006

[EVENTS]

[ENTERTAINMENT]

Movie:

Who Can Afford to Go to the Movies? by Gao Yifeng

What Can Film Classification Do? by Liu Yeqing

March of the Penguins: Love Finds Its Way in the Frozen World by Yu Zhijuan

Batman Begins: Not Another Batman Movie by Sun Peng

Ke Ke Xi Li by Sun Peng

The Incredibles by Sun Peng

The Shawshank Redemption by Sun Peng

12 Angry Men (1957) by Sun Peng



Music:

"Super Girl" Returns, With New Rules by Li Mu

Hanson, After Seven Years, They Came by Chen Xizi

Why are their art lives so short? by Huang Zhenhua

Why are their art lives so short? A Rebuttal by Lv Zhuo

On the Chinese Music Scene, a rebuttal to a rebuttal by Ellen

My Bloody Valentine: Loveless by Chen Yongrong

Mira--Apart by Chen Yongrong

My Little Airport "Roaming Zoo Really Matters" by Chen Yongrong

Bocelli concert in China by Liu Yeqing

ENTERTAINMENT NOTES by Huang Zhenhua

What Is Wrong With China’s Entertainment Business? by Guo Kaiyu

[SPORT COMMENTARIES]

[ARTS & BOOKS REVIEW]

1.02.2006

NATIONAL, ARTS, THEATRE: A Lethal Taste of Sartre

Death Without Burial (Morts Sans Sépulture)

Review by Shi Rui

2005 was the 100th anniversary of the birth of Jean-Paul Sartre, one of the greatest thinkers of the 20th century. People all over the world, especially in France, held activities to commemorate him, and a large number of books were published to tell his life story, to judge his philosophy, or to introduce his works to young people today.

Sartre was always a good friend to China. He loved China, he loved our socialist system, and in return he earned the adoration of Chinese youngsters of the 70s and 80s.

On Dec. 23rd, the Drama Society of BFSU put on Sartre's Death Without Burial as its annual 'dog and pony show' which gave us a chance to get closer to Sartre's play and his existentialism.


The Story and its Themes

A group of French Underground fighters are caught after a bloody, but unsuccessful mission. Only their leader, Jean, escapes. Later he is captured under an assumed identity and from a cage he watches his comrades and lover as they go out to be tortured before he flees. Of the others, one, Sorbier, commits suicide rather than talk, and a young boy (he was changed into a girl in the BFSU play) is killed by his fellows rather than be permitted to talk. The three others in the cage, Henri, Lucic, and Canoris, endure torture, deliver false confessions to be set free, and then are killed at the whim of a Vichy officer.


Atheism

Sartre was unmistakably atheistic. He talked about man only, man alone, afraid, and desperate for the meaning of life.

In the play, there is this dialogue:
Canoris: "Shall I find you a priest to listen to your confession?"
Henri: "The hell with your priest."

This is the most obvious declaration of Sartre's attitude towards God and church; he took them as an irony, a joke.

Also, this is the only line in which something related to God is mentioned. Although people are trapped, they do not turn to God for help. During war time, faith and belief become fragile, not only faith in religion but also in political philosophy like fascism. In the play we see the doubts of some of the Vichy officers. One of them said, "They are fucking nuts, including those Germans."

At the end of the play, on the big set, the red swastika flag falls and lies crumpled and insignificant on the floor, leaving the background wall empty and white. Fascism was only a dream, although it was once the most popular "religion" of the time. Hitler was not God. There is no God at all.


Freedom, Choice & Responsibility
Man is condemned to freedom
Man is nothing else but that which he makes of himself.
Man is responsible for what he is.

The free choice of man and the responsibility it brings are the main topics Sartre deals with in his works. He thought that man has the freedom to choose, that we are responsible for our own emotions, our behavior and the choices we make.

In Death and Burial, every prisoner faces the same question: to turn in Jean or not? To be Judas or to pick the glory of a martyr? They are totally free before they make their own choice.

This is only the first choice in the play and each character has different opinions. Henri, Lucic, and Canoris choose to keep the secret, the little girl wants to talk, and Sorbier chooses to delay his choice. When Sorbier jumps from the windowsill he finally makes his own free choice.

The second choice goes straight to Jean: to kill the 15-year-old girl and keep his own life, or to give himself up and sacrifice 60 comrades along the way? In this part, responsibility plays an important role. Jean is not a common underground fighter, he is a leader, so his choice influences more than a man's life.

In the 4th scene the three survivors are faced with their last choice: to live or to die? Since they have a well-planned false confession, they can live if they want.

Canoris tells Lucic: "There are other people who need our help, we cannot die a meaningless death."

All of these lines are telling people to make their own choice and, at the same time, to be responsible.


Existence Precedes Essence

One will never be able to explain one's action by reference to a given and specific human nature.

"Existence Precedes Essence" is the core of Sartre's philosophy and this single sentence can cover all the topics I discussed above. It denies the existence of God, fate, destiny, and even human nature. There is no human nature at all.

Take Sorbier for example. He is not a hero at the beginning of the play. He hesitates, he fears, he wants to know himself, he lacks all the good features a hero should have: Courage? No. He is anxious and nervous before torture, and he tells others: "I'm afraid of myself. I'm ill and my nerves are frail..."

Perseverance? No. He says: "I always ask myself, 'can I carry on?' and then my body worries me." Loyalty? No. After the first round of torture Sorbier realizes "If I had known where Jean was, I would have told them." ... "I'll even turn in my mother when they beat me."

But his last choice, suicide, makes him a hero and brings him individual victory.


Comment on the Play as Theatre

Generally speaking, Sartre is not a good playwright. There is too much thinking in the story with too little conflict and climax. Sartre's plays become boring, with every character a philosopher delivering long monologues to tell his thinking on life.

It is said when this play was first published in France, a friend of Sartre's put it on the stage. He made great changes to turn the drama into a more emotional one and the play received a very warm welcome. But Sartre got mad at his friend for the changes. Later Sartre put on his original version and no one came.

If we only judge Sartre as a writer, much more criticism can be given here. However, Sartre's thinking is always brighter than his literary works, so till today we can do nothing but read, think and understand.

 
free web counters
New York Hotel Las Vegas


Site Meter